From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: update-subdirs and lisp/term Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:13:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <831vlut4sy.fsf@gnu.org> <83ws3mrm6f.fsf@gnu.org> <83ske9smzy.fsf@gnu.org> <83my4hsg49.fsf@gnu.org> <83ljk1sbt3.fsf@gnu.org> <83iqf5s9en.fsf@gnu.org> <83fxa8sv5e.fsf@gnu.org> <83bpkwsmiz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1254050062 8335 80.91.229.12 (27 Sep 2009 11:14:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 27 13:14:15 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MrrhS-0006qP-5r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:14:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59374 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MrrhM-0000F8-LM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 07:13:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MrrhE-0000F2-OY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 07:13:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mrrh9-0000Dq-FI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 07:13:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60173 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mrrh9-0000Dh-8H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 07:13:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:45409) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mrrgz-0002Mn-6k; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 07:13:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail01.m-online.net (mail.m-online.net [192.168.3.149]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488701C152D0; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:13:13 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan2.mnet-online.de [192.168.1.215]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F95901F5; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:13:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.3.149]) by localhost (dynscan2.mnet-online.de [192.168.1.215]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X3Z7VeaOAbaS; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:13:11 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from igel.home (DSL01.83.171.162.247.ip-pool.NEFkom.net [83.171.162.247]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:13:11 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id 462F310C609; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:13:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: I like the IMPUDENT NOSE on that car.. Are you a TEEN-AGER? In-Reply-To: <83bpkwsmiz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:35:32 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:115687 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > A remnant from past, perhaps, when lisp/term held only >> >> >> >> >> >> > terminal-specific files? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Doesn't it still do? >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > No. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> In which way? >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > All of them. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Please expand. In which way is term/vt100.el not terminal-specific? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I didn't mean vt100.el (or its ilk). >> >> >> >> >> >> ??? But it is one of them. >> >> > >> >> > Yes, but not the only one. >> >> >> >> But you said "all of them", which includes vt100.el. >> > >> > "All of them" was a response to the question "in which way". IOW, >> > "in all of the ways", not "all of the files". >> >> But they are all terminal-specific in some way. > > No, only some of them. Others are non-specific in all ways. No. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."