From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14574: prog-prettify-symbols breaks font-locking Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:35:48 -0400 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: References: Reply-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1370986612 3536 80.91.229.3 (11 Jun 2013 21:36:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:36:52 +0000 (UTC) To: 14574@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 11 23:36:51 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UmWFH-0003TW-76 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:36:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33173 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UmWFG-0003KR-QW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:36:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58369) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UmWFC-0003KC-UU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:36:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UmWFB-0001AX-Ul for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:36:46 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52894) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UmWFB-0001AT-RX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:36:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UmWFS-0007Ph-Fi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14574 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.137098658628373 (code B ref -1); Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jun 2013 21:36:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57118 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UmWEr-0007NY-TQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:36:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56509) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UmWEp-0007NF-Us for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:36:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UmWET-00014b-45 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:60726) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UmWET-00014X-0n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58227) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UmWER-0003GB-9Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:36:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UmWEQ-00013x-FL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:35:59 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:45712) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UmWEQ-00013p-8A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:35:58 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UmWEP-0002pQ-BH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:35:57 +0200 Original-Received: from 11.79-161-196.customer.lyse.net ([79.161.196.11]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:35:57 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 11.79-161-196.customer.lyse.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:35:57 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 19 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 11.79-161-196.customer.lyse.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.3.50 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:mHoSoXS90Mu9DxNKRgPkomiecCk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:74990 Archived-At: On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:29:49 +0200 Juanma Barranquero wrote: JB> I'm seeing another problem with prog-prettify-symbols, but I haven't JB> filed yet a new bug because for now I can only reproduce it with my JB> setup. JB> Sometimes `lambda' gets correctly prettified, and sometimes no (see JB> attached image). ... JB> Composed with the following character(s) "ambda" by the rule: JB> (?l ?a ?m ?b ?d ?a) ... JB> Adding a char before it or otherwise modifying the line makes the JB> lambda be correctly prettified again. Weird. Weird. I don't know what's happening, and it works well for me. Does turning `font-lock-mode' off and back on fix it? Ted