From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32932: 27.0.50; render bugs on macOS Mojave Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 09:59:00 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20200203204408.GA59034@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <20200203213041.GC59034@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <20200207201802.GA7538@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <20200208141335.GA9391@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <20200210074404.GA44470@breton.holly.idiocy.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="65574"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= , 32932@debbugs.gnu.org, Aaron Jensen To: Alan Third Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 10 10:00:13 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j14vN-000Gt8-MW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 10:00:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58519 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j14vM-0005qD-N9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 04:00:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40957) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j14vD-0005q2-UU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 04:00:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j14vC-0005Zz-T0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 04:00:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47686) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j14vC-0005Yo-OA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 04:00:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j14vC-0001Se-LK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 04:00:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 09:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32932 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 32932-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32932.15813251525531 (code B ref 32932); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 09:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32932) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2020 08:59:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53659 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j14uO-0001R8-2v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 03:59:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f50.google.com ([209.85.128.50]:36878) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j14uM-0001Qr-BB for 32932@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 03:59:10 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f50.google.com with SMTP id a6so2936521wme.2 for <32932@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:59:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AzPdg66EW6LZ+hsy25+1tzz53ohIl4FsD9Z0v2tRw6M=; b=IEks+zJp4Ql9HuKUrPbNsELod+tSpVgF2dznofi+TxpJzUc/Ay4knjk4rsevlIwMnE N0bncdaEbc3yUorJed9bvnHuTtfvC4ILJYtZLesZB9cnPylUgFXeh6APA40WLKCHCq8c rCan7Xh5o2R+xMqUGBlujNpf5WHMmvSuRZ9qVB9rPH6SAhjDO85opi+XgoJYcoYOzO/2 H7fMhlITBEE3cdBC//cUKDQ/A+1A0+y4IYeMxs5CLkm3ePpqKqkC/WU26Sg6HzfpYCDu LIfdDhfCOJv+VVDub9Mf+unOHEKAm1Z7vlVTJhyugD9i8R7nbMGjkpBygNBUleOnAMHq U0+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AzPdg66EW6LZ+hsy25+1tzz53ohIl4FsD9Z0v2tRw6M=; b=brrwtYyBYerIPM+e0jByVGHv7d83iAqvmixbm2HzuxZw+BYAhB+u5jT9ax6M2X9i/Z dV/qc10Ac+p/F5Ya3srX6RT9rqASuXCk96O0n3pNZ8bogcrEOcDNqTJciVsrZX6ysxsG 0hb2P6py77WekXXLEt+z1Ze/e/il16ZUYnZZPl97SHB7NVpc02URDofNq3fpBjrETr5K uUFT5vDuYEftcvRbfumMPVD6BMAnZxRuzhYahKUNzLPQgZihS7SXTg2Wt88o8kxdpf/W K+p+MKCun3i3v9hRknO0XphqTOcas2zyfZAghBlibqDIh7c5EhRax6bnE0i9nZqrtPiJ PgiA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVkp7X0GADOVHkYadqll0KI+EdPgeWkkbJKYGA/sKGqthns8Nbs A/cBWo9vxTUfSQaxjz7kI8VmXmWV X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzKjbzuNq5RhEp6d4a8tFJ/EobJ4edn6LxCFzRY5JF5pYrR4PEbM0iANJ5zYTnPh9eeoqOLlw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b603:: with SMTP id g3mr15106469wmf.133.1581325143893; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:59:03 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from rpluim-mac ([149.5.228.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a9sm10518522wrn.3.2020.02.10.00.59.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:59:03 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:175861 Archived-At: >>>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 07:44:04 +0000, Alan Third said: Alan> On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 08:45:25AM -0800, Aaron Jensen wrote: >>=20 >> Yeah, unfortunately. Are you on Catalina? I can try the build on my >> work machine as well. It's a 2019 MBP 16", so pretty close to my 2017 >> at home, but different. A hardware issue seems unlikely... Alan> No, I=E2=80=99m still on Mojave. Alan> Anyway, one last thing to try. I was reading up on how MacVim han= dled Alan> this same issue, and while their drawing techniques are quite Alan> different, they did find performance problems with CGLayers so Alan> switched to using CGImages. I=E2=80=99ve given that a go and I do= n=E2=80=99t think Alan> this patch is quite as fast here as the CGLayer one, but it may be Alan> faster for you. I=CA=BCve not measured it, but in interactive use this seems fast enough for me (as was the previous patch). Robert