From: Matt Armstrong <matt@rfc20.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 46397@debbugs.gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, craven@gmx.net
Subject: bug#46397: 27.1; Cannot delete buffer pointing to a file in a path that includes a file
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:46:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2wnv3wx1o.fsf@matts-mbp-2016.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83sg5r276b.fsf@gnu.org>
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Matt Armstrong <matt@rfc20.org>
>> Cc: 46397@debbugs.gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, craven@gmx.net
>> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:10:45 -0800
>>
>> I'm coming to the opinion that issuing a prompt from `unlock-buffer'
>> itself is a bad idea, but I think prompting from `kill-buffer' is
>> okay.
>
> What do you propose to do for all the other users of unlock-buffer?
They continue to signal errors.
I would be happy to send a list of reasons why I think this is a safer
thing to do than prompting. (reasons that I admit I could be misguided)
>> I could write a whole essay about why, but instead I'll just
>> propose the following and ask for your thoughts:
>>
>> (a) Modify `kill-buffer' to call `unlock-buffer' sooner, closer to the
>> point where it is already running hooks prompting the user.
>
> Why do we need to move the call? Can we leave it in its current
> place, and thus minimize potential unintended problems this could
> cause?
In part because `kill-buffer' currently calls `unlock-buffer' after this
comment:
/* We have no more questions to ask. Verify that it is valid
to kill the buffer. This must be done after the questions
since anything can happen within do_yes_or_no_p. */
(This class of problem is also one of the reasons for my answer above.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-19 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-09 9:47 bug#46397: 27.1; Cannot delete buffer pointing to a file in a path that includes a file Peter
2021-02-09 23:47 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-02-10 0:23 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-02-10 15:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-10 19:23 ` Paul Eggert
2021-02-10 19:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-10 22:39 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-02-12 7:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-12 9:36 ` Paul Eggert
2021-02-12 11:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-12 23:59 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-02-13 8:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-11 22:14 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-02-12 2:20 ` Paul Eggert
2021-02-12 7:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-13 1:15 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-02-13 1:26 ` Paul Eggert
2021-02-13 8:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-13 8:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-14 0:49 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-02-14 19:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-14 22:16 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-02-15 15:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-16 0:49 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-02-16 1:55 ` Paul Eggert
2021-02-16 15:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-16 11:53 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-02-22 19:24 ` bug#46397: [PATCH] " Matt Armstrong
2021-02-19 19:10 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-02-19 19:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-19 21:46 ` Matt Armstrong [this message]
2021-02-20 9:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-21 0:36 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-02-21 23:43 ` Mike Kupfer
2021-02-22 1:42 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-03-14 18:03 ` Bill Wohler
2021-03-17 23:36 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-02-24 17:37 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-02-24 18:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-01 16:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-05 22:19 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-03-06 9:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-06 23:39 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-03-07 2:50 ` Paul Eggert
2021-03-07 5:57 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-02-19 19:45 ` Paul Eggert
2021-02-19 21:52 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-03-08 2:18 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-03-11 14:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-17 23:49 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-03-17 23:51 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-03-20 10:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-22 1:43 ` Matt Armstrong
2021-03-27 9:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-02-10 0:26 ` Matt Armstrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2wnv3wx1o.fsf@matts-mbp-2016.lan \
--to=matt@rfc20.org \
--cc=46397@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=craven@gmx.net \
--cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.