From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is this a bug in vc-svn? Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 15:23:09 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1160922235 31738 80.91.229.2 (15 Oct 2006 14:23:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 15 16:23:52 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZ6tx-0000Ah-Fq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:23:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZ6tw-0005fr-Nu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:23:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GZ6tj-0005cX-K6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:23:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GZ6th-0005VP-0R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:23:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZ6tg-0005V3-Sx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:23:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GZ72b-00062T-Cw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:32:37 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GZ6tR-0008Vp-5j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:23:09 +0200 Original-Received: from sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.223.202]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:23:09 +0200 Original-Received: from sdl.web by sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:23:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAC0AAAAtBAMAAADINP+pAAAAMFBMVEUALGQLNGsEPX4ePG4M S5EvT30XVqJTa5E/erhrgaKKnriouczCzt3W3+fl6+/9//y5jpouAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlw SFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9YJAhUPOvTTW44AAAIMSURBVDjLddQxaBNRGAfw/8u1 hBSRCDXgpII4n4gVxUAHucmhgyAUraaUj44FtyK4uThYkSKKmtukghoQO7RDBhEUtCk4FNHQwUFc zIGIVJN7vu97791dir7lcr+8++d7774XaDc+3Q1xYnHD3SWw1/RxCB77Hwx5ugw3gmtFf1lF9sWj 3D+iMEbb3gdT3i7cM4EHvf/0EQ/NzetqxXkaOu9x5oAmx6x/dVyREvrUCDrisfPL5tHv6RuaxQz7 wMe0ud7zRHM4wP7LcbnHiapGdCjoGH/l3PzabXNRRJNoGl9yvkf3ZdVHqYF6giy+rn/D+1iCP8h8 R6414+UEO/9ytYkfu51zVAsfcrcVR3QFiPFi1/ySqR9YQGvYVURUZZfdCU/df/JM91dWlo/wPgBT 7EE077tCrxLHI2SfoPme43SV5njVkmMit73foMNwPk5EN993ezrtdt+e3SdFLBmf4B0ELnE9JWWL ayE2G9sorlc6YBNxQDay6KMJ4hEpeNgr//EzxsdtvKrrb5lfl/mz8nkm6wAEbZlvc5pZP6KsbT6v XHX0l3xrE6mfl3Va6+xVtMUjfoC7fsFXmbJjhG7Jng3yxhNH9Fx8y/le7bwm3nenJmiKm/YsneOU O276RXvueDHB4ru1q46ne9b5cZVv8PS2P79bx5SqyqsOjp98Wvgf+Lxux9r6Rpp6/wujf5KPYInm gAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.0 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:tnB6A3953s2iF/uG//8EdR/hn5s= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60762 Archived-At: On Sun, 15/10/06 11:12 +0100, Richard Stallman wrote: > Would you please test this in Emacs 22? > That is what we are actively debugging. I will try to get an Emacs 22 running in a few days. But for this bug, I'll provide a full test case and others can see if it is reproducible in Emacs 22. Thanks, -- Leo