* Language question
@ 2008-12-10 15:18 Carsten Dominik
2008-12-10 15:36 ` Bernt Hansen
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2008-12-10 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: emacs org-mode mailing list
Hi,
this is a question to the native English speakers out there.
If I write in the documentation
"Cross referencing with unique IDs is hard to document"
do I then write
ids
IDs
id's
or ID's
????
Thanks.
- Carsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Language question
2008-12-10 15:18 Language question Carsten Dominik
@ 2008-12-10 15:36 ` Bernt Hansen
2008-12-10 16:14 ` Ian Barton
2008-12-10 16:18 ` OT: " Carsten Dominik
2008-12-10 15:42 ` Matthew Lundin
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bernt Hansen @ 2008-12-10 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: emacs org-mode mailing list
Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
> this is a question to the native English speakers out there.
>
> If I write in the documentation
>
> "Cross referencing with unique IDs is hard to document"
>
> do I then write
>
> ids
> IDs
> id's
> or ID's
>
IDs or ids is fine. id's and ID's is possessive (the ID owns
something).
I'd probably use IDs in this case.
id is just short for identifier normally so
... unique identifiers is hard ...
would also be fine.
HTH,
Bernt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Language question
2008-12-10 15:18 Language question Carsten Dominik
2008-12-10 15:36 ` Bernt Hansen
@ 2008-12-10 15:42 ` Matthew Lundin
2008-12-10 16:13 ` Womick, Don
2008-12-10 17:03 ` Samuel Wales
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Lundin @ 2008-12-10 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: emacs org-mode mailing list
Hi Carsten,
"IDs" is correct.
Some older manuals of style suggest using "ID's", but "IDs" is the
most widely accepted plural form of the abbreviation.
Matt
Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> this is a question to the native English speakers out there.
>
> If I write in the documentation
>
> "Cross referencing with unique IDs is hard to document"
>
> do I then write
>
> ids
> IDs
> id's
> or ID's
>
> ????
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Carsten
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: Language question
2008-12-10 15:18 Language question Carsten Dominik
2008-12-10 15:36 ` Bernt Hansen
2008-12-10 15:42 ` Matthew Lundin
@ 2008-12-10 16:13 ` Womick, Don
2008-12-10 17:05 ` Peter Frings
2008-12-10 17:03 ` Samuel Wales
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Womick, Don @ 2008-12-10 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Carsten Dominik, emacs org-mode mailing list
's always indicates possession, never plurality.
I don't think there's a hard-and-fast choice between "IDs" and "ids",
but "IDs" looks better to me, since it's clear that you're using an
abbreviation. But if you write "id" (singular), be consistent and write
"ids" (plural).
-----Original Message-----
From: emacs-orgmode-bounces+don.womick=cingular.com@gnu.org
[mailto:emacs-orgmode-bounces+don.womick=cingular.com@gnu.org] On Behalf
Of Carsten Dominik
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:18 AM
To: emacs org-mode mailing list
Subject: [Orgmode] Language question
Hi,
this is a question to the native English speakers out there.
If I write in the documentation
"Cross referencing with unique IDs is hard to document"
do I then write
ids
IDs
id's
or ID's
????
Thanks.
- Carsten
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Language question
2008-12-10 15:36 ` Bernt Hansen
@ 2008-12-10 16:14 ` Ian Barton
2008-12-10 16:18 ` OT: " Carsten Dominik
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ian Barton @ 2008-12-10 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Bernt Hansen; +Cc: emacs org-mode mailing list, Carsten Dominik
>> If I write in the documentation
>>
>> "Cross referencing with unique IDs is hard to document"
>>
>> do I then write
>>
>> ids
>> IDs
>> id's
>> or ID's
>>
>
> IDs or ids is fine. id's and ID's is possessive (the ID owns
> something).
>
> I'd probably use IDs in this case.
>
> id is just short for identifier normally so
> ... unique identifiers is hard ...
> would also be fine.
>
I would suggest calling it a UID. As Bernt said using an apostrophe is
incorrect in this case. I would also suggest doing it like this:
"Cross referencing with unique IDs (UID) is hard to document"
I was always taught that you place the abbreviation in brackets after
its definition, so the reader can easily find where it's defined.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* OT: Re: Re: Language question
2008-12-10 15:36 ` Bernt Hansen
2008-12-10 16:14 ` Ian Barton
@ 2008-12-10 16:18 ` Carsten Dominik
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2008-12-10 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Bernt Hansen; +Cc: emacs org-mode mailing list
Hi Bernt,
thanks for the quick answer. It is amazing how different these
things are in different languages. My life is in 3 languages,
English, German, and Dutch, almost evenly spread between the three.
In German, you put the ' only if you are actually
omitting a letter, like in the English "let's". If it is possessive,
you actually explicitly don't put it.
For English you explained it.
In Dutch, it is a pure pronunciation issue (if I did understand
this correctly). There you only put the ' if the connected "s"
would spoil the correct pronunciation of the word.
May be Esperanto was not such a bad idea after all........
Many greetings from Babylon.
- Carsten
On Dec 10, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> this is a question to the native English speakers out there.
>>
>> If I write in the documentation
>>
>> "Cross referencing with unique IDs is hard to document"
>>
>> do I then write
>>
>> ids
>> IDs
>> id's
>> or ID's
>>
>
> IDs or ids is fine. id's and ID's is possessive (the ID owns
> something).
>
> I'd probably use IDs in this case.
>
> id is just short for identifier normally so
> ... unique identifiers is hard ...
> would also be fine.
>
> HTH,
> Bernt
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Language question
2008-12-10 15:18 Language question Carsten Dominik
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-10 16:13 ` Womick, Don
@ 2008-12-10 17:03 ` Samuel Wales
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Wales @ 2008-12-10 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: emacs org-mode mailing list
Hi Carsten,
If you write "IDs", it is correct. Please do not be misled by my
having written "org-id's". "ID's" used to be correct, but no longer.
I was treating org-id as a variable, and org-ids would have been
confusing. I often type in lowercase and then capitalize sentences
before sending. The apostrophe was a fast way of disambiguating.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Language question
2008-12-10 16:13 ` Womick, Don
@ 2008-12-10 17:05 ` Peter Frings
2008-12-10 17:25 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Peter Frings @ 2008-12-10 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: emacs-orgmode Org-Mode
On 10 Dec 2008, at 17:13, Womick, Don wrote:
> 's always indicates possession, never plurality.
>
> I don't think there's a hard-and-fast choice between "IDs" and "ids",
> but "IDs" looks better to me, since it's clear that you're using an
> abbreviation. But if you write "id" (singular), be consistent and
> write
> "ids" (plural).
I'm not a native English speaker, but since the Chicago Manual of
Style is within reach...
About the plural:
<quote>
* Letters, nouns coinages, numbers: So far as it can be done without
confusion, single or multiple letters used as words, hyphenated
coinages used as nouns, and numbers (wether spelled out or in figures)
firm the plural by adding s alone:
the three Rs
YMCAs
...
* Abbreviations with periods, lowercase letters used as nouns, and
capital letters that would be confusing if /s/ alone were added form
the plural with an apostrohpe and an s:
Ph.D's
x's and y's
SOS's
...
</quote>
About the capitalization:
I can't find it right now (might have read it somewhere else), but I
think the rule is rather simple:
Acronyms should be written in uppercase when they are spelled out in
speech, e.g. ID (Ey-Dee). When they're being used as words, they're
written in lowercase, e.g., 'radar'.
Combining the two, I think it's "IDs".
Cheers,
Peter.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Language question
2008-12-10 17:05 ` Peter Frings
@ 2008-12-10 17:25 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2008-12-10 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Peter Frings; +Cc: emacs-orgmode Org-Mode
Wow,
I am blown away by the flood of answers with various degrees of
explanations.
Thank you all very much.
- Carsten
On Dec 10, 2008, at 6:05 PM, Peter Frings wrote:
>
> On 10 Dec 2008, at 17:13, Womick, Don wrote:
>
>> 's always indicates possession, never plurality.
>>
>> I don't think there's a hard-and-fast choice between "IDs" and "ids",
>> but "IDs" looks better to me, since it's clear that you're using an
>> abbreviation. But if you write "id" (singular), be consistent and
>> write
>> "ids" (plural).
>
> I'm not a native English speaker, but since the Chicago Manual of
> Style is within reach...
>
> About the plural:
> <quote>
> * Letters, nouns coinages, numbers: So far as it can be done without
> confusion, single or multiple letters used as words, hyphenated
> coinages used as nouns, and numbers (wether spelled out or in
> figures) firm the plural by adding s alone:
>
> the three Rs
> YMCAs
> ...
>
> * Abbreviations with periods, lowercase letters used as nouns, and
> capital letters that would be confusing if /s/ alone were added form
> the plural with an apostrohpe and an s:
>
> Ph.D's
> x's and y's
> SOS's
> ...
> </quote>
>
> About the capitalization:
> I can't find it right now (might have read it somewhere else), but I
> think the rule is rather simple:
>
> Acronyms should be written in uppercase when they are spelled out in
> speech, e.g. ID (Ey-Dee). When they're being used as words, they're
> written in lowercase, e.g., 'radar'.
>
>
> Combining the two, I think it's "IDs".
>
> Cheers,
> Peter.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-12-10 17:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-12-10 15:18 Language question Carsten Dominik
2008-12-10 15:36 ` Bernt Hansen
2008-12-10 16:14 ` Ian Barton
2008-12-10 16:18 ` OT: " Carsten Dominik
2008-12-10 15:42 ` Matthew Lundin
2008-12-10 16:13 ` Womick, Don
2008-12-10 17:05 ` Peter Frings
2008-12-10 17:25 ` Carsten Dominik
2008-12-10 17:03 ` Samuel Wales
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.