From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Helmut Eller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MS-Windows build broken in Fmake_network_process Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:17:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83634jglab.fsf@gnu.org> <831vf7ge57.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6hfeyzw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269636327 489 80.91.229.12 (26 Mar 2010 20:45:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:45:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 26 21:45:22 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvGP9-0007yU-6E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:45:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60257 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvGIV-0005Te-Ds for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:38:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NvE6s-0002gl-F2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:18:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52010 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvE6n-0002ds-Q7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:18:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvE6K-00087q-Qp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:17:48 -0400 Original-Received: from dial-181203.pool.broadband44.net ([212.46.181.203]:42172 helo=ix) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvE6J-00087Q-Lj; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:17:43 -0400 Original-Received: from helmut by ix with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvE6H-0001BP-Uv; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:17:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83y6hfeyzw.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:09:23 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:06:54 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122716 Archived-At: * Eli Zaretskii [2010-03-26 19:09+0100] writes: >> From: Helmut Eller >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:05:47 +0100 >> >> * Eli Zaretskii [2010-03-26 18:56+0100] writes: >> >> >> From: Helmut Eller >> >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:48:18 +0100 >> >> >> >> getsockopt is not Linux specific; it's pretty much part of the BSD >> >> socket API and is available on Windows too. Why don't you just link it >> >> in which would simplify wait_reading_process_output too? Why do the >> >> Unix ports have to pay the price for the Window port? >> > >> > Perhaps you've missed this part of the fragment I posted: >> > >> > /* getsockopt(,,SO_ERROR,,) is said to hang on some systems. >> > So only use it on systems where it is known to work. */ >> >> Have you test case to reproduce it? > > No. And I don't know enough about this issue to work on the problem, > even if I did. Then link in getsockopt. That's the most direct solution. Helmut