From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Helmut Eller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9463: 24.0.50; Errors should not be continuable Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:53:51 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316634895 32750 80.91.229.12 (21 Sep 2011 19:54:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:54:55 +0000 (UTC) To: 9463@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 21 21:54:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6Ssd-0001AD-16 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:54:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36711 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6Ssc-0001bu-GI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:54:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43492) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6SsZ-0001bo-QO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:54:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6SsY-0002rP-Lu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:54:47 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44925) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6SsY-0002rL-Ff for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:54:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6Sso-0003PJ-8q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Helmut Eller Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9463 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.131663486613054 (code B ref -1); Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2011 19:54:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6SsE-0003OV-Ai for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:54:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6SsC-0003OO-ID for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:54:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6Sru-0002ky-F6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:54005) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6Sru-0002ku-De for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43238) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6Srt-0001ad-D2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6Srs-0002kO-JO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:54:05 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:43820) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6Srs-0002kE-Cj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:54:04 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6Srq-0000hd-RT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:54:02 +0200 Original-Received: from 212.46.173.155 ([212.46.173.155]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:54:02 +0200 Original-Received: from eller.helmut by 212.46.173.155 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:54:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.46.173.155 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:mqWYyoua+khqm/vWZuaQnBFxuxg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:55:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51587 Archived-At: * Stefan Monnier [2011-09-21 19:09] writes: >> You claim that this is "important". You neither explain why it is >> important nor why not destroying information was a problem previously. > > I already explained. You just disagree that this is important, and you > instead think it's more important to use the "stop at error" as > a heuristic to prevent you from stepping too far. My experience > is different, so we disagree. > Have you tried the defadvice I suggested? No, because I was hoping that reporting a bug is not a waste of time. Now I know better. Helmut