From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: xscheme minibuffer bug Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 09:02:16 -0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451408564 20748 80.91.229.3 (29 Dec 2015 17:02:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 17:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Federico Beffa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 29 18:02:42 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aDxfW-0007UU-LR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 18:02:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49410 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDxfV-0008Jn-Tj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:02:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40997) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDxfF-0008Gx-SO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:02:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDxfE-0002gc-Su for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:02:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233]:35494) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDxfB-0002f0-4d; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:02:21 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id 78so129321413pfw.2; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 09:02:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=9qekLjkq2EJc8RG8mXSM64vlJXqihxMbi/EvRURkKX8=; b=BgVPwWovyGft09uL0JHK0WDOr/Jlcx26/p/2o7KeuqFjPeCJDuD2CuEQPgki98gW2n KafI/vRC4pftD7TKGAN+5wUQ6oYTMy7SHJfkFmBFSQXuYt/l4AvXe/S3g9s7qv0L8ZU/ j3pZa+FGwXFveNxnlm2JJBFC7HwbqWw54/xCcw69DYyAIBJnKg9BxjcFmj2J19nzlHxp SQAet5k1hsbWLgInyIt9iBHEARioucq1E7EvZ8e2KS5VFMD4yQWdabo8ioCN29fjjUYz 5kzRAxTdz5gCiNLF+RWcXBEgKCyvOXMy9OCUsjMD0zmNgDmz65GgeesW5rIXbU+HuFID FDhg== X-Received: by 10.98.73.75 with SMTP id w72mr87617094pfa.161.1451408540427; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 09:02:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r14sm75178709pfi.8.2015.12.29.09.02.19 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Dec 2015 09:02:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 22BF011B7EA50; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 09:02:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Federico Beffa's message of "Tue, 29 Dec 2015 11:34:36 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Federico Beffa , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197101 Archived-At: >>>>> Federico Beffa writes: > I get the correct behavior if I replace '(point-min)' with > '(minibuffer-prompt-end)'. However, the behavior is only correct if I > load the non-compiled '.el' file. If I byte-compile the file I still > get the problem described above. Any advice on what's going wrong? Hi Federico, Can you submit this same text through M-x report-emacs-bug, so that we can discuss under a tracking number? Side-question for Eli: Is there a way to create a bug on behalf of another user, such that they appear as the reporter? Or is it just forwarding to debbugs and using the control address? -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2