From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GNUstep display glitches Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:59:03 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87ziwfbce3.fsf@fastmail.com> <83k2njnqmc.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: John Wiegley NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452373203 15470 80.91.229.3 (9 Jan 2016 21:00:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 21:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Random832 , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 09 21:59:56 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0c5-0003Nm-Kk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 21:59:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42993 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0c4-0000T1-RM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:59:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0bb-0008Pu-NR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:59:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0bZ-00049s-Nd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:59:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231]:33346) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0bV-00048i-KE; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:59:17 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-x231.google.com with SMTP id cy9so300616232pac.0; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:59:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=tzHFg3/As09KBU5nX+EVxwxZsArkv4Rixww8tiLIpR8=; b=CA5XHgpl8IFseHjoVTdLaFtC6o2COKC/idkxKLfg2s8uM6n774NRVtaW7j1kVu4vuQ 6qYaPnsRy6xVV5etX8L+jejPVRTwVzD4pqMTRZgRJPNUh4OBn163dUeYn+nVtSg2AWwq JrrbAgiTSevp9j22NpCd63rmEZJRhe8350/MK8Ansl/skK8bXH9wzy/9aSh5vqr2nKTx rE7Sq476Q4dtR23NKgG4/UINDynp84sjqw7KHwvpt/xLeJ6J65grDDgMHwHXCiTdQDk3 grrHqNiCKM223P+D62fTP+LhZpMcA3H5BtAlAuXTrio9nUQ5JyUAcjMOAV+tgqcvFsgb lA/Q== X-Received: by 10.66.216.7 with SMTP id om7mr167759418pac.90.1452373157017; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:59:17 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cl3sm71643460pad.11.2016.01.09.12.59.15 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:59:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id B1A5A1232B7FB; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 12:59:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83k2njnqmc.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 09 Jan 2016 09:44:59 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Random832 , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197934 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> I have several issues to report about problems in the NS build of Emacs >> under GNUstep, and I'm not sure if I should report them as a single bug >> or as one bug for each issue. > Separate bugs, please. Definitely as separate bugs. The more specific a bug report can be, the eas= ier it is for later reviewers to attempt reproduction or make comments. Large b= ug reports require commensurately large efforts to comprehend and analyze them. =2D-=20 John Wiegley GPG fingerprint =3D 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJWkXSXAAoJEMFE2PTxn+YwWI4MAIw92F9GNFJKGj+EG4h1sSfE deDPw6KnqCjL4iMzF0bVVUXheH50Bx4Yt9esrCJhqNQY41DtRYrw1JeGYMhBGqc/ WkANxfFZb/n6DSFCwIMGfUgd7+8kv/+NJwTpgWy8KyiHZ8CcbzmUcE38yuitC3Gq E4k50AhsT0xJM7zBzU0/+k8C6smtGLuCzn7TJ/PQdsXZXv0bed/ltpC1XuhKJaMi K7x2+584BR6o37CDFFP3FBrlcUtaMHlwIcv5xxZPhx5rz5TDC+VJwPOjulPsa6r3 ejwACL78NoptKLTyNXcGJ7OC1XdJ/vNsMLVTJIGmj+ZksDR2NUD9kB06EdJQPj4d 5Rl49eysZ+4XaVSKgLq+Y6A0ku90MREis6YiRBDqi67cedN0Ty8rtBnTBScjDNZY mXVpHT+F3TnrFg8ZB2U8FZymZcc3IB6RH4fV12U98TuKmpVsL+lsHgUnUu8+vRao nHaS8i329dhz8MNR5AOkeJxzKXY+vSDZUiAmKz+3JQ== =gsLx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--