From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 b6d6304: Comment on last change to define-derived-mode Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 06:51:44 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87wppgax5o.fsf@oremacs.com> <874mciekrq.fsf@oremacs.com> Reply-To: John Wiegley NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457362337 14999 80.91.229.3 (7 Mar 2016 14:52:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:52:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Oleh Krehel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 07 15:52:10 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1acwVy-0006z8-4C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 15:52:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56217 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acwVx-00013k-Ac for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 09:52:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52239) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acwVs-00013b-CW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 09:52:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acwVn-00050k-PQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 09:52:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]:34324) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acwVn-00050Y-Hx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 09:51:55 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-x236.google.com with SMTP id fy10so79625655pac.1 for ; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 06:51:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=jgDDV/SyHkaBgW1/nkB54u5yRNtcUsg6O0FaFTrCydI=; b=G6FWg6eKhQrqJ0VIcwFbyS5uKOk54b2Yb7ItPev1e5ncd5eaZ+rIrucYsskUd8xKrM oD+wkuF3jo36Rcr6hrDZzpcmqssvHSUBZ5CVUdGP1ryXSK4lkRDc3nlqAxRCeiqF+mDA Jq+d0uYmuRtTx2GkcqAYYd9NcX57Rvj9R+VVyynI3GtorMiuyqiif9TyKERvRyjeb/kN uGGsCp29g5q2gzGT7vuHCbge74cPJ77oxBQYaJcNF2AfKtUnElclBo4oS7Lv+7zxu2Df ouqnILmY0lwzX+Og/lsQRsFXyqO7hpK0d/4zFAzxK7N016oyFZKtflyUc5milet479RH 880w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=jgDDV/SyHkaBgW1/nkB54u5yRNtcUsg6O0FaFTrCydI=; b=mKIhUZrj/hM0pi4WDdOQonch/nPMuI5SappOGmDateFpO9CsxTo1FUy/XfokxPW2wl 1x/GYVTsqUgPyfD7un6pFW+vHzRQ2qb60lQQzsIBUR8zutdwOWHU1OwGbRoio7BT9hEP kmKgDwZJOssPaiMdjYVFqU86vPjAXzRYxRqKEaln6nQ6lbqUdeiV2mEpzAMjsnILbJMu Ne+5WnZ9k7e8DS8457gdPZZIeDw09mUqISFHqZAIbLW3QPfcwvQCKEX7nmvLjgP5Oqpt vA5zAPkE+auHTSfJAxLB6HkTWpFINmeyYwWe+91TV7nSdJd9XGlvfaXA/AbfQPbQh4EK rKIA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKFineF1HxSWlxqOief+zrfeJ5ukCKjuhiZSvGKTzyEpeX0T2b1QPYUXm5Jp76WTA== X-Received: by 10.66.65.109 with SMTP id w13mr33680628pas.142.1457362314609; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 06:51:54 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kw10sm24833787pab.0.2016.03.07.06.51.53 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Mar 2016 06:51:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id EAB701342BB16; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 06:51:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <874mciekrq.fsf@oremacs.com> (Oleh Krehel's message of "Mon, 07 Mar 2016 09:48:25 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Oleh Krehel , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201040 Archived-At: >>>>> Oleh Krehel writes: > So I've added an indentation hint that 94% of the code already follows, > while 6% doesn't. It's up to you as the maintainer to decide if we want to > have a 94/6 split just to not ruffle any feathers. Or we want to enforce a > rule to make all code uniform - easier to read and contribute to. If we're formalizing what 94% of our code already does, that can helpful for setting expected standards. However, that's 94% of our code, not 94% of everything that's out there. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2