From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-syntactic-keywords obsolet? Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:45:43 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20160619145934.GC5875@acm.fritz.box> <6bc7b3bc-ddb7-c041-9f68-f8b5faeca63b@yandex.ru> <20160619151836.GE5875@acm.fritz.box> <1d4c62e6-905b-4a51-28b8-e68169fb3269@yandex.ru> <20160619153455.GG5875@acm.fritz.box> <11c988f0-94c0-40dd-b9cd-5a5e27028b63@yandex.ru> <20160619171531.GH5875@acm.fritz.box> <751427e7-f305-7790-99f5-dea230d8e6c4@yandex.ru> <20160620105850.GB3166@acm.fritz.box> <23d7473e-50da-b6dc-17a7-1fec4aad6bfa@yandex.ru> <20160620152535.GB2192@acm.fritz.box> <076b7311-ad16-4913-b0ec-fc73ea4550a1@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466462801 18417 80.91.229.3 (20 Jun 2016 22:46:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 22:46:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Noam Postavsky To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 21 00:46:34 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bF7xh-0000mp-7H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:46:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46918 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bF7xg-0005sn-Gp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:46:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51641) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bF7xb-0005sh-09 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:46:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bF7xW-0008Am-Of for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:46:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22d]:33629) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bF7xW-0008Ag-Hm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:46:22 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id i123so54526026pfg.0 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:46:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=2bkBaJcp17oj4tVHO+pAEn0ofbiHxJbViWk/yMUqHsM=; b=Pj7uztpgqD5fp1jxlCX3rvX8auGymOyOM2LqnXPn6aZcnVpDa6y5u+uLgj0M025wKA 2mkJL6/OgfInGTuL2/RomzfsCsgSyIelpiU+mbAph7mHEIDB0agQyj1Ro1BPukwu4dgb 3PShOc9ncXbvsOq4pCQhpLgstZ62Gn3z5RozdXvhzDwvvnyZvXTm+vMTkiVobTHnbk/i BUBZQBHg2Ecnp9oZsgWJzNFZx5mcITuGw5am3Ejr0SdBLfwfn4m9G+euuQu1vIFo8uSd FR9eqlgRZleEudNKF8K9ca1G0lKLzqBHcT5mP/p0Bpa4VzKN/ET+ik5v8fOvOjCUaMQS 84uw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=2bkBaJcp17oj4tVHO+pAEn0ofbiHxJbViWk/yMUqHsM=; b=TMFFNF9vbPeHscIHyeR0AgDYIbGSg5RjfC1UqwSOJTRQudYN6b3lVIvlZW1Gvfe3Zk UNnk1f6OVH7mNaVbfDCLoatWElzo8MEvdWu/y15EJYc4B/YJM/GAldyp3IPV4muhoLXx XTx3Se2FFGS8aBD3EP0Eko1a5/sn6fq38QH+G96+91CgTpbIb/3+uCM1aRB6rQ2Hdccl p3ytK0JBfTME2GB96gcgCc8YWZmNUiwrnlqhBJf3JaSHRMUT7JuXgpT3S5kEjN0lb4ZF dOeU65AHM57Jwpbo0m8ziDLXRfS8cLHT0R6S89W4B79AJe4oRf88zpoj2bRJm7hdtML+ nycA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLLziB0eJ/gTKd6mh/bjNviyRs6/ghjy9tkOUwgVkShTLHZhUxCtDJfp+GvNEITUg== X-Received: by 10.98.87.138 with SMTP id i10mr24556948pfj.1.1466462781461; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:46:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x68sm26202950pfb.88.2016.06.20.15.46.18 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:46:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id CBD119DEB3C; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:46:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <076b7311-ad16-4913-b0ec-fc73ea4550a1@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Mon, 20 Jun 2016 19:45:06 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.95 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Dmitry Gutov , Alan Mackenzie , Noam Postavsky , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204615 Archived-At: >>>>> Dmitry Gutov writes: > Why don't you do us all a favor and educate yourself about other languages > and language modes before arguing that before/after-change-functions can be > a general solution as-is? Dmitry, There is really no need for this kind of tone. Alan is striving to solve a problem; let's help him find the best solution, rather than criticizing his efforts. If before/after-change-functions is not a general solution as-is, all we need are some examples to demonstrate this. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2