From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66738: 30.0.50; Gud LLDB regressions Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:06:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1985D138-4723-4744-A1C5-1DC1057AEB4B@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27892"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 66738@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 25 11:06:59 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qvZqs-00075I-Ln for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:06:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qvZqf-0003XM-Fv; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 05:06:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qvZqU-0003W8-Se for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 05:06:34 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qvZqS-0005vg-Ff for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 05:06:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qvZqw-0003vA-9M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 05:07:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66738 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 66738-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66738.169822480615048 (code B ref 66738); Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66738) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Oct 2023 09:06:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57284 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qvZqg-0003ue-Be for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 05:06:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-x62a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62a]:46562) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qvZqb-0003uL-0y for 66738@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 05:06:45 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-9c53e8b7cf4so775085666b.1 for <66738@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 02:06:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698224764; x=1698829564; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=G0Z6suF2ApztClASEXQNIpKbbUa7jTdKrGkl9Zwng6c=; b=D+TG+zu70a1B+YGJdn24pwhRlnc6w06xOtRgiGZ8a37nBVE50OOuKRDe96X9ruoKS8 +bjgATfSh48pfGYDxP6h9MIyxYRQCIqdTcuA8yAZ+kW4yUPPZDfAKRUbKcC05aABYLVW rOW/5iWfynYpAvt/O968IeH8fxbePA5Jq04EiQG7vQmRqox9bAE8sEp75AqLk0ShTFx2 eBV2c9SxkGYLTvdbeDjrIkVbMYDs5jbxDrtXHd/jyhzfkJdozgH0gnkD6SYdD02Z5sG1 u9aZqdzTrRK1aH5+qY8QdKe4IhngJyWRmbrAGn09uwfCdSVBWfWRSRNkdUUujEMCGViW UKaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698224764; x=1698829564; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=G0Z6suF2ApztClASEXQNIpKbbUa7jTdKrGkl9Zwng6c=; b=j4gGJooNQmtOIfX+D+EQNJ4n+Jtx3FStT6wHG+ab0QSLa8vVmcTXyPi56bIF3Uz8W1 GXbM75x9s+iSyNS6Zi5phDrVj65e/7TdZRdSig8qrXmEziWivICLaS69i4yWUXYZclT0 1qdASpYw/guz63L4ihO3G6hMwzUE8zb7jdwDJDIfvAh/SujNTEC6GFyY/BkgMeq0/bNG wa9dbLfzqpV3rkgEsJxpMKZodGsjA3JiptwC4k0pgrWa4NBu/lNsZv7RsXQaAm0wrkxe 9wZtTM1/x2Nh6j8fycBH2dn9EbjMvJgh7nJMgjZOq0mmijPZdbWntNzeIsjyx59koN7m Wu2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxyfqQ9Ph0tqKdIiCeYb1DSW2ICSNotqAKKcKJX70plAzQhzLym Qe+rIwunQUBOkbEtDWx5dTUgJuol5MmUqw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFzcRqkp5iKYv1CnztcrPOtT+3qEhNfn1W9LllLU8Ckr17rWYbAr05QXGMjmpVri4l5CD9xwg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:940b:b0:9b2:74a1:6b30 with SMTP id dk11-20020a170907940b00b009b274a16b30mr8987802ejc.33.1698224763879; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 02:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Pro.fritz.box (p4fe3a69d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.227.166.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c2-20020a170906694200b0099bc80d5575sm9449875ejs.200.2023.10.25.02.06.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 25 Oct 2023 02:06:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1985D138-4723-4744-A1C5-1DC1057AEB4B@gmail.com> ("Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?="'s message of "Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:32:10 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:273151 Archived-At: Mattias Engdeg=C3=A5rd writes: >> 1. M-x lldb RET leads to errors. *Messages* contains: >>=20 >> error in process filter: gud-marker-filter: Text is read-only >> error in process filter: Text is read-only > > Sorry, I don't observe this myself. Turns out it's comint-prompt-read-only, but... > >> I think this can also be seen >> when binding inhibit-read-only around the delete-region. > > That sounds strange. Did you bind inhibit-read-only to `t`? That should h= ave overridden any text protection. > Unless I can reproduce it, I'm afraid you are left with the task to > debug it. ...I'll fix this myself, thank you. Yeah, I did that. But it seems I have misinterpreted what the intention of the delete-region is. (I'm kind of refusing to read the partial terminal enumlator part of the code :-). > >> 2. Nitpick: when extracting the file name in the filter function, with >>=20 >> (group (+ (not (in "\n\r")))) ; 3: file >>=20 >> this means that file names cannot contain LF and CR, which they actually >> can. > > And that is a possibility that I'm going to ignore unless it's > actually a security problem (and I don't think it is). File names > containing control characters on purpose are excessively rare in Unix > systems and disallowed on Windows (at least 0-31). Then let me ask differently: why did you change this in the first place?