From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Subject: Re: Inactive times tamp is active Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:19:04 +0000 Message-ID: References: <61d9857d70e5d2e8aa9047ef51d5c4fd@science.uva.nl> <89c289420235e298a20d56248f0e6f94@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HPND8-0006jl-RY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:19:30 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HPND6-0006jZ-EG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:19:29 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HPND6-0006jW-8W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:19:28 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HPNCr-0003Sl-CY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:19:13 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HPNCg-0001kM-Dg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:19:02 +0100 Received: from sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.223.202]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:19:02 +0100 Received: from sdl.web by sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:19:02 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2007-03-08, Carsten Dominik said: > On Mar 8, 2007, at 18:46, Leo wrote: > >> I was able to reproduce with the following steps: >> 1. emacs -Q >> 2. M-x org-mode >> 3. C-c ! RET >> 4. Mouse1 click on the date and the agenda buffer pop up > > Ah, I misunderstood. I thought you were saying that such a time > stamp can select a headline for display in the agenda, for example > that > > * Meeting with Leo [2007-03-14] > > would cause an agenda entry on that date. But it does not. > > What you were doing is using a time stamp as a *link* to a specific > date in the agenda. This is the way it should be, both for () and > for [] time stamps. > > Which point exactly of the documentation are you referring to? > maybe I need to clarify something there. > > Thanks. > > - Carsten I think I misunderstood the following b/c I never use time stamp in headings. ,----[ (info "(org)Creating timestamps") ] | | `C-c !' | Like `C-c .', but insert an inactive time stamp not triggering the | agenda. `---- Thank you for clarifying this. Regards, -- Leo (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)