From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Need help with upstream vs Debian emacs-23.4 build differences Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:49:48 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1340924981.32095.176.camel@hp.my.own.domain> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340952605 26322 80.91.229.3 (29 Jun 2012 06:50:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 06:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: svante.signell@telia.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 29 08:50:04 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SkV1o-0001MC-KK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:50:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33641 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkV1o-0001YE-A0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 02:50:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55604) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkV1g-0001Wd-Q8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 02:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkV1f-0004g1-5O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 02:49:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:44761) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkV1e-0004fn-V2; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 02:49:55 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend4.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.183]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3WNpQ63qzpz3hhbb; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:50:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-106-247.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.106.247]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3WNpPn6710zbbvn; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:49:49 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id 311AACA2A4; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:49:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: I smell a RANCID CORN DOG! In-Reply-To: <1340924981.32095.176.camel@hp.my.own.domain> (Svante Signell's message of "Fri, 29 Jun 2012 01:09:41 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 212.18.0.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151282 gmane.emacs.help:85560 Archived-At: Svante Signell writes: > eshell/esh-groups.el, calc/calc-loaddefs.el, subdirs.el are the same as > distributed, but loaddefs.el, cedet/ede/loaddefs.el, > cedet/semantic/loaddefs.el, cedet/srecode/loaddefs.el are not! > > What is triggering the differences, and where can they be found, > especially the large lisp/loaddefs.el debian/build-?/lisp/loaddefs.el? Since you didn't tell what are the differences that is hard to answer. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."