From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Recommend these .gitconfig settings for git integrity. Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:17:08 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87a8nlfqj9.fsf@red-bean.com> <83h9ht1o8q.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvrle8ho.fsf@red-bean.com> <56AE8126.9090708@cs.ucla.edu> <87wpqo77yc.fsf@red-bean.com> <87bn80ifmh.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87k2mo75bx.fsf@red-bean.com> <56AFB869.1080206@cs.ucla.edu> <83si1cyy3e.fsf@gnu.org> <56B06282.2050701@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: John Wiegley NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454401066 12679 80.91.229.3 (2 Feb 2016 08:17:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:17:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Karl Fogel , =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes , Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , Emacs Development To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 02 09:17:39 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aQW9Z-0007OD-TX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 09:17:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55699 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQW9Z-0008JG-2d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 03:17:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQW9F-0008Iw-RI for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 03:17:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQW9C-0006PS-CZ for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 03:17:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::236]:32929) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQW9C-0006PN-7g; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 03:17:14 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-x236.google.com with SMTP id is5so142738983obc.0; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:17:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=s6TgitOiQqW7ReKvg96YYcXeQZz7/AhAr5bNzbp3cVY=; b=h6xO9BBBwGGn9cYBqur+nhYm/rBkWJ/zrLbQ85lfh3gRlIiLCDnajP/tyb9r84gu2G nJL5cIAXta7uKwNRgc1/i+cAp5dqRyZ+/v1GO1v4GbAdLPMV3QA6k7uxPISCZdoyxzNc DFTQOFBkA+JaUyNFfncS44CDNsDBEHqxkdzHdQ8bUhv0exj/GgLoPPCCRSHG6mNSH1It 8x08Uxi7O8uzxY3gDUfZNrTwblKqXv6pSmXwRi2ob8ahe/CqVbfAhssZG/qIwSJCQae9 t0DZTYK+UxLwNziID8rb0NKsJk/1h+PEi/x3Z/8aZ4SXJKZwOtyOd7+Bk3GrkffaOUI+ KONA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version :content-type; bh=s6TgitOiQqW7ReKvg96YYcXeQZz7/AhAr5bNzbp3cVY=; b=IWlzmEtr4Ga2SE3uOX+E0IfuUVDjwxhwbc7DcQyrY9oks3vGrnM4wwxlLjNDR0SXTb fFP8nHnoeyQAN2Baw1zYuhEs6s/4UjB0hJN0Q6A9QMgq9//r8iqcaePP6duc6Bok4o9F WloOqgy1wvVbSmt3KImUWUjbnhn8UP+p4vd2G5lfjuwv0XDBCbsQUqGBdPiJ1N+srayp KSLdNyEqlQgb78tqSJYtBWqVEZtuAnRZKC2SP55oV55yP+qllFJ1QOVbtdRcXSlQMEw8 qu9xzWa0b+pBgmr2mizis0Oq3wZsdr+1IMWcCm5H+mvg6MHUUJI3Voa+KSgNZC5wi8S9 USPw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORlaI2aNCXoMwDJ0TJAf3b9UpdkwrA6o8NIfJiP534WMpC1DYXGCVewonHB7kXQjg== X-Received: by 10.182.242.4 with SMTP id wm4mr21686172obc.85.1454401033733; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:17:13 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id qs6sm74120oeb.3.2016.02.02.00.17.12 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:17:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4632312A0D7EC; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 00:17:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56B06282.2050701@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Tue, 2 Feb 2016 00:02:10 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Paul Eggert , Emacs Development , Karl Fogel , =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93?= =?utf-8?Q?scar?= Fuentes , Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199160 Archived-At: >>>>> Paul Eggert writes: > Should we pay the checking overhead to catch these reliability and security > problems? That's the question. Emacs developers who are using this setting > report that the overhead is small enough as to not be a significant issue, > which suggests that the extra checking is a good idea. Even still, this is purely a Git matter, and not an Emacs matter. This choice shouldn't be automatically made on user's machine, however beneficial. It's been recommended now in git-workflow, but should not be applied automatically. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2