From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Arash Esbati Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why not include all ELPA packages in an Emacs release? Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 17:27:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87bk4ql3u5.fsf@jeremybryant.net> <864jagu9ji.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15172"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Stefan Kangas , jb@jeremybryant.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, philipk@posteo.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 29 17:28:52 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sCLEP-0003jr-Ub for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 29 May 2024 17:28:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCLDH-0004KY-81; Wed, 29 May 2024 11:27:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCLDF-0004J8-1E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2024 11:27:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCLDD-0003Dt-8e; Wed, 29 May 2024 11:27:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=Ibq8FvaVPLYX7IeRzkMUw+F8tP18esxG3hFDYbYeitk=; b=QWg2nGMhxEk2qfJoVILD pSMl80Thgw31PBFeyyDIQblLFED14bQpmeUa5IcYWG/tycvCa34el68howmCWkag0b8dKkVzMVAsB jSQVrv/ABH0hnkOcR0EAnMWEQrLC1jnrnQaMaZIZp7dJ9LvHoZcf69TxkW2LNq4SXWvm8KdI7nD9o yt4cEeFvGxNJu4BSNayf8K1HQM+xXTCCaJlNo6IWNELxTTGdKP77Dg8LWz5DkEWAMmbZM/4obQ2OY TzXKtJF2/CLqAceTlwNuK0vWyIZaXa/yLKO8GNCkx6yWBdhjMFwAIayNRbGYUmkETbSLP/a4ZiCvd gziWysma6YfzdA==; In-Reply-To: <864jagu9ji.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 29 May 2024 14:44:49 +0300") X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:319693 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > If there are packages on ELPA which we consider to be a must for users > (I don't think there are, but maybe I'm forgetting something), lets > add them to core instead. If Emacs considers in-buffer completion an important feature, then I'd say corfu and cape are must. vertico and marginalia are also must in my book since they offer a better experience with vertical minibuffer completion. And while we're at it: There are sometimes requests for adding AUCTeX to core. Do you have an opinion about that? Best, Arash