From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chris Moore Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C file recoginzed as image file Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:11:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: <45A2D32A.8020804@gmail.com> <45A3650B.80504@gmail.com> <45A3771B.5070108@gnu.org> <45A38409.9080402@gmail.com> <45A40F63.5070605@gmail.com> <45A4317F.6090401@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1168441904 8453 80.91.229.12 (10 Jan 2007 15:11:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:11:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , c.a.rendle@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 10 16:11:34 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H4f6u-0006cl-QW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:11:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4f6u-0001n7-Bu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:11:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H4f6e-0001kQ-8j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:11:12 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H4f6c-0001iB-Jf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:11:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4f6c-0001i0-5k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:11:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [66.249.92.170] (helo=ug-out-1314.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H4f6b-0005Qj-Ln for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:11:09 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so137428ugf for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:11:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:to:cc:references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:x-sa-exim-connect-ip:x-sa-exim-mail-from:x-spam-checker-version:x-spam-level:x-spam-status:subject:x-sa-exim-version:x-sa-exim-scanned:sender; b=Fo4Jt1qH/0C35sDm+KlSwHQ/d8o0FHC7OUstbqfapm2P+Cq7GeGvQnC8aNG9X56/5Y6TMxDXNv2olh6bmTs0b9mA7QSVfBFRvIZegeN0Gj0AT28lK4wgMds1/LkaaYT5DDOozYo7RyA4bxs0NZ8HrQQncnoHEbwz+xCRurKza+A= Original-Received: by 10.67.19.20 with SMTP id w20mr536584ugi.1168441868588; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:11:08 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from chrislap.local ( [89.176.28.156]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y1sm31107654uge.2007.01.10.07.11.06; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:11:07 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chrislap.local) by chrislap.local with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H4f6U-0001nD-Sy; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:11:04 +0100 Original-To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" In-Reply-To: <45A4317F.6090401@gmail.com> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Wed\, 10 Jan 2007 01\:21\:19 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dooglus@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on chrislap.local) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65111 Archived-At: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: > One of the main troubles with MS libraries has been that it has > taken a long time for them to fix the bug sometimes. But lately my > impression is that this has improved much. Nice timing. :) Just yesterday Microsoft's monthly 'patch Tuesday' included only 4 of the planned 8 updates, leaving unpatched a 0-day Word vulnerability that is actively being exploited in the wild: http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2081067,00.asp