From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BASE_PURESIZE Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:37:19 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8363a6gytm.fsf@gnu.org> <834opqgpzs.fsf@gnu.org> <83skd9f6ok.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1256380771 31959 80.91.229.12 (24 Oct 2009 10:39:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 24 12:39:24 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N1e1r-0005TG-KZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:39:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43335 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N1e1q-0007VM-Sk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:39:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N1e03-00073L-P7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:37:31 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N1dzy-00071T-C2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:37:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44539 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N1dzy-00071F-48 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:37:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:37775) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N1dzu-0008AG-Vc; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:37:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail01.m-online.net (mail.m-online.net [192.168.3.149]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A25C1C001C7; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:37:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: iKZXuMvrr2+EeHWhXs2BbNdM1rAGpVD19BKyARcOCmM= Original-Received: from whitebox.home (DSL01.83.171.146.84.ip-pool.NEFkom.net [83.171.146.84]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092EE902AE; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:37:21 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by whitebox.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id ECFCA1E5379; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:37:19 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: I want a VEGETARIAN BURRITO to go.. with EXTRA MSG!! In-Reply-To: <83skd9f6ok.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:05:31 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116362 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > For the record, the extra use of purecopy caused the pure_bytes_used > value to go up by 52KB on 32-bit Windows, and by 92KB on 64-bit > GNU/Linux. So it looks like the ratio is actually closer to 9/5 than > to either the old 10/6 or the new 11/7. Or maybe I'm missing > something. It all depends on the ratio of string data vs. lisp object pure storage. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."