From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: immediate strings #2 Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:25:17 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4ED35057.8010103@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322519133 9532 80.91.229.12 (28 Nov 2011 22:25:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dmitry Antipov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 28 23:25:26 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RV9dd-00015B-7h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:25:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58163 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RV9dc-0003eP-Od for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:25:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51386) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RV9da-0003e9-6l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:25:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RV9dZ-0007t9-0e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:25:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:55963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RV9dY-0007sC-SR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:25:20 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (frontend1.mail.intern.m-online.net [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F018A188A18B; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:28:40 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: 6LGNa/z9uZvp4IlQcdPlUYDsoCfYO06I1Qrit0YoImQ= Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-111-82.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.111.82]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 747EC1C00069; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:25:18 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id A01AECA29C; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:25:17 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: WHOA!! I'm having a RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE right NOW!! In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:54:36 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 212.18.0.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146326 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Not that it's relevant to Emacs, but I don't know which part of the > C standard would force a C compiler to layout all unions at an > "addressable" offset. 6.7.2.1#13 Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."