From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Separating obarray handling from abbrevs Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:13:08 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87d1vvfa1k.fsf@cumego.com> <87r3k95ppo.fsf@cumego.com> <87mvuomik1.fsf@cumego.com> <87bnb4nqvz.fsf@gmail.com> <87a8qoxjez.fsf@cumego.com> <87r3jzhvz2.fsf@cumego.com> <87vb9aojhi.fsf@petton.fr> <87wptpsjhv.fsf@cumego.com> <87y4e4zd8b.fsf@petton.fr> <87r3jly3oh.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447978430 1238 80.91.229.3 (20 Nov 2015 00:13:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Przemys=C5=82aw?= Wojnowski , Artur Malabarba , emacs-devel To: Nicolas Petton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 20 01:13:35 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzZKY-0005KI-O7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 01:13:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44640 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzZKX-0006bg-VM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 19:13:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47408) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzZKI-0006at-PN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 19:13:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzZKD-0001Xj-Q0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 19:13:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]:33206) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzZKD-0001Xc-KB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 19:13:13 -0500 Original-Received: by pabfh17 with SMTP id fh17so99869362pab.0 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:13:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=EJHiUIoU/bw8RwCUUpOUoJYecFGd5YdmeOpTOll2yss=; b=Kp1/A5sLdLVUrICiSnyoJ3po8721VgJUvqWSeG+/pIlpmjpqJToOsGGWLX5BAEBBjG AHyTFaBFVLkwSRrzKvLkefrmJJLlKnOqgrkVFHJ9tiOzFCsbcx7RqMSLVpFVkasxgebA OZ1pawxUYfNDvtdjqWgySRzixofuI5X5R8e2NpmOBXsnrWOWFukEciX1xE5LQIZ4ZwzD oKASpHFcukATrM6fYzJXAnbPN/q2njYlwxhwC5ORObVMJN59U2+JNI8x29STr5yaioWa pCv3TSka2+EHGc/2r3wamuWAGxl3eU2Blug+MZzG25ya5eSJy9owdQXzxmzeHxur2r+r 0BoA== X-Received: by 10.68.191.9 with SMTP id gu9mr14632394pbc.54.1447978392849; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:13:12 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id of1sm12910371pbc.11.2015.11.19.16.13.11 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:13:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2FDA710A3B2C9; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:13:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87r3jly3oh.fsf@petton.fr> (Nicolas Petton's message of "Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:23:10 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Nicolas Petton , =?utf-8?Q?Przemys?= =?utf-8?Q?=C5=82aw?= Wojnowski , Artur Malabarba , emacs-devel X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194839 Archived-At: >>>>> Nicolas Petton writes: > One question: I was offline the last few days, and I missed the emacs-25 > branch discussion. I guess I should not push this to emacs-25 as we are > already in feature freeze? You are right, it should go to master, since it represents a new API with new accompanying documentation. John