From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: James Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23755: 25.0.95; Emacs 25.0.95 Line number is in fringe Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:56:06 -0700 Message-ID: References: <83shwifal9.fsf@gnu.org> <20160612215037.GA70967@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83oa75g2le.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2htfbd4.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9ctcgec.fsf@gnu.org> <3D6F64ED-4325-495C-A733-74A60006943E@gmail.com> <8360t8cmci.fsf@gnu.org> <20160617174134.GA68643@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <20160617175806.GB68643@breton.holly.idiocy.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466193444 28421 80.91.229.3 (17 Jun 2016 19:57:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 19:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: James Nguyen , 23755@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alan Third Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 17 21:57:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bDztA-0005Tq-Vt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 21:57:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60077 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDzt9-00044Q-UC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:57:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50940) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDzt4-00043Q-1l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:57:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDzt0-0006kj-4u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:57:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60413) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDzt0-0006kf-1P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bDzsz-0006FK-Sg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:57:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: James Nguyen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 19:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23755 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23755-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23755.146619338223959 (code B ref 23755); Fri, 17 Jun 2016 19:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23755) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2016 19:56:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44517 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bDzsL-0006EN-N7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:56:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.220.44]:32866) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bDzsK-0006EA-7X for 23755@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:56:20 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b13so31261399pat.0 for <23755@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:56:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=qwjX4vtw6xxkjF+FyrlyQNEJubE7uob1GljY90RiPxM=; b=exWrDB8pTDbKh8jOxPj+c/xFz+cob2fHlW4L2oPIzaJotGHMiCiUYkqzao84aPq2CU qO8nB409wlkENgnnTm7Tt2u4MJ8JdNQB3u/B9HdI+Yc6InWOkh1HUdl7L5mmVFVTgyML 6Myo42Dh1iPMh6uC68h9yMmV/8K8nklyv+OC3PJ3Mpc7nHcGqDlGeVfa1B/Fynecf9kj WDd5EZGzs4eiYIOrObcgbnenxy9tbwt6HWVLg+C+ZCLbdyJnbVvIMfYUaOXcIEDQUgmw IK5Z4hLytAUDLFCaTb2EeB2uJKFgWuolt4mC6QUTr9bdTMdYmA3g/TEViwQ8946JZABO GUhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=qwjX4vtw6xxkjF+FyrlyQNEJubE7uob1GljY90RiPxM=; b=GdGLXLvakJMeFP1gzsW6KeIiCTT8DLn4iOKAzOOc7eGOXNdU8HrX+qDOFSg2jM+uPD BnwSJuil3S20zFpBBjjOpJcq15LM8gGI7KvQDpfhp5xucbmiyeMlxGeelp9NtlErAeMG TLZnN4/IW+JcZ4ITv41a+GPe2ge797X8gdVAYZwDo2NZXn9v7WQa85VSwYUuHtwfT7ZP NYbbfKBPiZJryT9AEV9Pc+JRTMlSf1WLxFy6KPoklLb2yxMWKHjDrd428ufvXOAsJpe/ fGI8dwwYldqz47Wjcf8hzy1c5yyHN9SX8ka60U6l37+2Mv6OK2sS5UJPWH/4i4+Z1VQQ 0s9g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLYv4MXpj/QXY0DhfD58xKpG5i/m48XLueRmNtAheIsEKL5t+Tz/d6RO6QpOpNaog== X-Received: by 10.67.23.48 with SMTP id hx16mr4182887pad.7.1466193374172; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (c-73-189-102-185.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.189.102.185]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fd8sm70386030pac.23.2016.06.17.12.56.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Jun 2016 12:56:13 -0700 (PDT) User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.1 In-reply-to: <20160617175806.GB68643@breton.holly.idiocy.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:119689 Archived-At: Do we still need a recipe from me if Alan can reproduce this? Alan Third writes: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:48:51AM -0700, James Nguyen wrote: >> >> The font is https://github.com/madmalik/mononoki which I believe is fixed-width. >> >> > I don't know how to tell what font it is, but I suspect it's >> > variable-width and Emacs doesn't notice when they change size. > > Yeah, I realised after typing that that it probably has nothing to do > with the width of the characters, and everything to do with Emacs not > handling the larger box round the modeline. > > And FWIW, I'm using a different font. It's probably Menlo, which is > also fixed-width. -- James Nguyen