From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: An idea, now that we have dynamic loading Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 00:56:01 -0700 Message-ID: References: <8336yypvq0.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1526025256 13447 195.159.176.226 (11 May 2018 07:54:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 07:54:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (darwin) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 11 09:54:12 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fH2sV-0003Nn-AH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 May 2018 09:54:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37188 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fH2ua-0007UL-Sn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 May 2018 03:56:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33841) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fH2uT-0007Tl-QX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 May 2018 03:56:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fH2uT-0007kI-1c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 May 2018 03:56:13 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:48088) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fH2uN-0007jR-1y; Fri, 11 May 2018 03:56:07 -0400 Original-Received: from auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.228]:46535) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fH2uM-0001mJ-JW; Fri, 11 May 2018 03:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41B5218EB; Fri, 11 May 2018 03:56:05 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 11 May 2018 03:56:05 -0400 X-ME-Sender: Original-Received: from localhost (76-234-69-149.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net [76.234.69.149]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7CA6AE4474; Fri, 11 May 2018 03:56:05 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8336yypvq0.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 11 May 2018 09:11:51 +0300") Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , siraben@disroot.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:225224 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > Do we have profiles of the uses where there's a perceived latency? Are we > sure the latency is caused by Lisp code? No, this is just assumption on my part, I don't have any knowledge, or even a reasonably good opinion, that it would make things any better. I suspect that just getting Gnus to use lexical-scope everywhere would be a bigger win for less effort. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2