From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Helmut Eller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unifying emacs "go to definition" functionality Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:45:15 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361353538 16319 80.91.229.3 (20 Feb 2013 09:45:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:45:38 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 20 10:46:01 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U86FU-0008On-El for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:46:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45627 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U86FA-0001aQ-6u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:45:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52101) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U86F1-0001Za-Uv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:45:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U86Ex-00072B-VE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:45:31 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55466) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U86Ex-00071r-Ii for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:45:27 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U86FG-0008Hk-74 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:45:46 +0100 Original-Received: from 212.46.170.189 ([212.46.170.189]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:45:46 +0100 Original-Received: from eller.helmut by 212.46.170.189 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:45:46 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.46.170.189 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:nQk4D3BFRX6Pn2xuZZ251U9Y7Us= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157196 Archived-At: On Wed, Feb 20 2013, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Keybindings aren't cast in stone. > > There must be a very strong reason to throw out such a useful binding. We already threw it out in SLIME and most people say that they love the M-./M-, combo. Helmut