From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts? Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 14:43:12 -0700 Organization: New Artisans LLC Message-ID: References: <20151002.073900.472512461.wl@gnu.org> <83pp0x7mnq.fsf@gnu.org> <20151004.063952.389316157.wl@gnu.org> <83zizz1590.fsf@gnu.org> <838u7i1kpn.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443995019 30206 80.91.229.3 (4 Oct 2015 21:43:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 21:43:39 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 04 23:43:34 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zir4A-0001Ai-1b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 23:43:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43733 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zir49-00080p-6a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:43:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40593) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zir3x-00080f-3K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:43:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zir3t-0006iQ-T7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:43:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a]:33880) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zir3t-0006iK-Mc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:43:17 -0400 Original-Received: by padhy16 with SMTP id hy16so15761341pad.1 for ; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 14:43:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=kRVe5eDa4gPBkF+bw6OT39ZMClGD8Ac9ljFCx4igKoI=; b=I5x/gydNmwPOoQdduMKSAUsf8n3v1u1wSoF/hcDyEl1etq8oVBTOgc4dZ2nuNIiGkj Ai30FvWxXH5AHV6Du2lM8CMdc2om2iETEcgmTRgt6siRB2/KgvyxBju37+tg+vj/UVQL SNcH4H6j7nPJiUsyrKNPCNNgDT9zfvaPIqn0LTDZ4iicwCirEnCgEfl912YS7zxVNcMb nwDY6YzkF4CS+R703wn6mXoetVyU+gNX5w0SjEL8vByt1zJdML9H1s1JcHT1x7kW6+1v hIsmZ0q9NvauOXiQYGcHTqDonens5i4QB9vrIMNPJZy6y3VXG8/ppBBF6kHc46wI5k11 oMZA== X-Received: by 10.66.163.228 with SMTP id yl4mr35283811pab.112.1443994997197; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 14:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id qn5sm23572696pbc.74.2015.10.04.14.43.16 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 04 Oct 2015 14:43:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id AAA79F070C17; Sun, 4 Oct 2015 14:43:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <838u7i1kpn.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 04 Oct 2015 22:45:40 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190910 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > One of the things that always bothered me are the composition rules for > Arabic and Persian (see the end of lisp/language/misc-lang.el). Perhaps you > could take a look at them, in particular the ZWJ and ZWNJ related rules, and > other similar stuff. I think someone said in the past we lack some rules > there. Hmm, it looks fine here, but maybe I don't quite understand yet. Z and W are always "final" letters, making the J stand separate in ZWJ. The connective between N and J in ZWNJ looks as I'd expect. John