From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it time to build the first pretest? Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 10:00:35 -0800 Message-ID: References: <874mepguf6.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452189662 10371 80.91.229.3 (7 Jan 2016 18:01:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 18:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Nicolas Petton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 19:00:55 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aHErm-0006tq-An for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 19:00:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59941 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHErl-0006kD-C6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 13:00:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48702) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHEre-0006jx-42 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 13:00:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHErZ-00005f-S6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 13:00:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234]:34169) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHErZ-00005S-Mu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 13:00:41 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-x234.google.com with SMTP id uo6so245831895pac.1 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 10:00:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=k9pq6n5HG2zbqsoiw40ze+ZzLTKDu8id7cTcMKTiBhs=; b=Edlw75+blKF/R8cIVqJXDrahBVlgR5SCMvn1gmEyYu87oqpu37tbhsmHnUR5EvPIeB 6KsOcGaNbYgmPIMMj/LqDmjXnQLGPyYNMhfcd40YblUuUa0MZ30JN9oBs4f6yHE77h29 LrBPgVqVGhcvD+TQ7fJLddI42kKOWiq0SBqTT5UBUl6bmT0gsfEVn8LmNmdEq5zcVqlY SzpcAj/FzHaLG9dTdjLkyZ3LpJGTClA2vLjOdRrlkeqnAwfgnst//zpndMOszEVDo1ao MMWjRZl+CViwu3mdGFqjTjm0WuvFO0Wz+D5LIn9vSbISBCuOLCK9JqphEj3kUu1dO471 HzQg== X-Received: by 10.66.216.200 with SMTP id os8mr153627229pac.143.1452189641069; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 10:00:41 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id rt6sm160472738pab.17.2016.01.07.10.00.39 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Jan 2016 10:00:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 75ECD122321A5; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 10:00:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <874mepguf6.fsf@petton.fr> (Nicolas Petton's message of "Thu, 07 Jan 2016 18:40:13 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Nicolas Petton , emacs-devel X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197742 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> Nicolas Petton writes: > I've had this on my todo-list for a while: is it time to build the first > pretest of Emacs 25.1? Sure! I'm working on combing debbugs this week, to get a clearer picture of where 25.1 stands in relation to its release requirements (presently means: "no release-blocking bugs"), but we also could use community feedback on lo= ok and feel, new defaults, etc., so a pre-test now would be timely. Thank you. =2D-=20 John Wiegley GPG fingerprint =3D 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJWjqfDAAoJEMFE2PTxn+YwefgL/0k3vCkGnhodeMth15ryWals MVHa5XMOLbZOA7RGJaa38SDY+S1MN0GDJDS++Q58GUnfWaGd4kzWAiRgnUy1Dih0 /pby1wwhABVl61CQYViEf/wfttiT4iKpHuxT0qpjw5YDIXkI0E65Z3uG5sTGBHuT PVoa7MgyCWHL/Vf8By40MoeoHXbaj81gHW8NE541x7uSJ5siq/hZ+OhpqYLdMFwA 7OGmE3GJ71uUZalb/ahhBrMrfzYYZkGWx10ESdPQ6adSbw/GBcG7NDw35dP3YLjY zUl9wjpX8wPXoAgSEfPD++SBNw4Q7BnwhKEOojU6uFMCcxi0enbXd1iyxycvVs47 2Fwr+YC+JUao+3k92Vkz/GPd4iJGpKV/YAktTSiEWCmckbBHseDivVdKnLw4PpJ/ REseWVhKWxp2XQZZmLInRIoEgbUgIPzovrFV3EvcwNtDRKE0j5iRuwfNdqpEV9nr VephrDCObJ83bfwuuhc8cqneQkVP3GU9SOpIkSu85A== =do2p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--