From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 26.1 release branch created Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 13:24:43 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20170922193511.GC7229@ACM> <20170922220700.GD7229@ACM> <20170924143939.GC5725@ACM> <20170924194139.GA6793@ACM> <20170925190357.GA4651@ACM> <855b1231-2279-4fd7-a2d6-be65435bb8be@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1506371108 30010 195.159.176.226 (25 Sep 2017 20:25:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 20:25:08 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.130016 (Ma Gnus v0.16) Emacs/26.0 (darwin) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii , Paul Eggert , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 25 22:25:02 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwZw5-0007DE-GS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 22:25:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44135 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwZwA-00010Z-Sy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:25:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57150) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwZw4-00010L-1c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:25:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwZw2-0000BY-S7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:24:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236]:47347) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwZvz-00009n-81; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:24:55 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x236.google.com with SMTP id b1so8803539oih.4; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 13:24:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=IC6Rl5oU703QRlz6UAzVsJfe6EbC8vdH9dkQrxeOdL8=; b=qwfv9OKBiHq3b3+J6PhBx/2a5kRU0QpnBVErPRidfK3UKLGbRTMP9p2GM0ZwzmRWqN Z1v8z/dLf/ABtXykDrqKzN7Jg4/Q3D4qX8JtWgYXxGdBzTtF/cbpW5Yl55pHPpD0O4Ua mStntb+xHEBcn6FOlu23b+iNcPidFO7395Iym04Ss2B/j6ELfPnM2q4Emn2V35GmQlz0 f4ppRSwar9y3VRP/z8pgGhUbKcLcv5c55+xe4wetLapqZIgyDLgEpmukTAyJDbKO6IFe dOxjbbOdhli1hKaRJyIL5NJp/FjrQS9np6xLhjeVBWoJDNL1B+MLxaellcZ0yRNse3f6 RuqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=IC6Rl5oU703QRlz6UAzVsJfe6EbC8vdH9dkQrxeOdL8=; b=YDRU54gmPT5omRwrCnnGCOdXFRJyVf2EfCw9YlCRDRLjP+9jzsMd3N1HkKR/h9C3XB zFXQpOJkTlM6NP+3G6s8KQkVUgj/wUzIS1SKJBD4FYrSF7WT24wFgQIxGNG8Gi4Ck6sP z0BYYzO8bTtsI9s2ah8oc0glVflTxvuHOT1ryZCAFnGl+/234AOh3yqboGqxdsmB0cBP W/cXQJRq07ZWKDT257FX6F+tHOmuG8XUH2aAm0vUG9prPA2WPPvbFfEcaIB00pkwjFrh f50oEbkdJpq1gilnm0AO5I+YZ+W36z+9XmzJr15JGGQAmlC6RacGJUtNDezjRoFw5gnJ UwwA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhWmECagOt8x8jp2SYPArXhCeSaQDYC5bNSRRLdLOQbpO+tQ5d5 LUQl8Q5+zOIF7RyngQqfseg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBJ7RedJ9gNIKH7O0mdTte4HqoCX3c0syNnNQstT/Yaee1uHMUq959wN7bAqrSTd4wAAdNBAQ== X-Received: by 10.202.67.194 with SMTP id q185mr5430444oia.52.1506371094278; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 13:24:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-69-149.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.69.149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v14sm3523230oif.39.2017.09.25.13.24.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Sep 2017 13:24:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id EC2D1913DA67; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 13:24:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <855b1231-2279-4fd7-a2d6-be65435bb8be@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:43:44 -0700 (PDT)") Mail-Followup-To: Drew Adams , Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Paul Eggert , rms@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:218783 Archived-At: >>>>> "DA" == Drew Adams writes: DA> Another difference between the two (of course): With #1 you can easily DA> control the scope of the effect. DA> For example, you can use a single such `let' for multiple such messages. DA> And you can of course do this at any depth. And you can override that DA> locally at some depth using another `let', binding a different value to DA> `text-quoting-style'. Why not mention both ways of resolving the matter in the documentation? (message "%s") for all the simple cases (which should be most of them), and let-binding text-quoting-style for the complex cases. Programmers should really know about both. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2