From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Adrian Robert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Not loading the Registry settings Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:51:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4AAB93D4.8070201@harpegolden.net> <87skerr30v.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1253643575 3116 80.91.229.12 (22 Sep 2009 18:19:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Miles Bader , Emacs developers , Stefan Monnier , David De La Harpe Golden To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 22 20:19:27 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mq9xV-0007h6-Ff for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:19:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34024 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mq9xQ-00046L-E8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:19:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mq9wu-0003YU-Ie for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:18:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mq9wr-0003Vs-PJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:18:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35148 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mq9wr-0003Vj-KW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:18:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f178.google.com ([209.85.221.178]:45847) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mq9wm-0006Vs-Hv; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:18:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qy0-f178.google.com with SMTP id 8so3320687qyk.24 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:18:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:to:cc:subject :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=goTydbUh4GOF2iOJNib/6lO5VzyhtP4WRbcyTcNQSiE=; b=Okz9/oi5Jz0o2o5P+8DTXDWEFwSEhmviqINZPjWR3UATFptvLs37to/M7aiwXU/d6u 5o9NR3Z80nCcMlgsxRTGcScZ6Vr3jLQdpfql8gcVgrPv8mG3qbnMbaxNdxLs3pV4DmNu 2DFWyQVciIykleg/CYirBKDP3UMKksPOQHEaA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MRS6FSbXilpFmOaQ/nrHOaXMjRTAd0+JvO486iFRWbdxDDvGc4ILIIKHrm8rkC68io dLl3VnPsJWX4RGfTKX+xyShfbWPqVitiHPHcFFK6/nwRxyRjo4Wva7vbEdrPMKwoQRG9 5g45nUUDe2/+OFAsHTs9BobXw1yrPMlw+gAOw= Original-Received: by 10.224.91.74 with SMTP id l10mr1030397qam.241.1253643075659; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:11:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from hermes.local ([67.45.214.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm38940qyk.4.2009.09.22.11.11.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by hermes.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 749AD4D8EA7; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:51:42 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:48:30 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (darwin) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:115532 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 15:29, Stefan Monnier = wrote: >> I think that's OK, but the double-parsing of -Q is not >> very satisfactory. =C2=A0I'd rather see a new variable Vinhibit_x_resour= ces >> instead, which the Lisp code could set to non-nil when it parses >> the -Q argument. > > I had in fact done that before (though I reused instead the currently > undocumented emacs-quick-startup variable that startup.el uses now). > But I didn't want to mess with the processing of -Q/--quick in the > HAVE_NS block immediately following: You can remove the -q/-Q part of that after this because it is just doing what you are trying to do with the new patch. (Vocal NS port user consensus a while back was that the semantics of -Q implied that user customizations should not be loaded even if they come from the resource database instead of .emacs.)