From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Helmut Eller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5114: 23.1.50; (string-to-number (number-to-string most-positive-fixnum)) Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:18:13 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83d42tjy4q.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Helmut Eller , 5114@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1260026988 13826 80.91.229.12 (5 Dec 2009 15:29:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:29:48 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 05 16:29:41 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NGwZd-0006lF-W5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:29:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42599 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NGwZb-0000iW-UU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:29:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NGwY1-0008TA-VC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:27:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NGwXv-0008SE-AD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:27:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42885 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NGwXv-0008S8-0m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:27:43 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:52531) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NGwXn-0007km-6P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:27:42 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nB5FRPEf028097; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 07:27:25 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nB5FP5Zm027833; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 07:25:05 -0800 Resent-Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 07:25:05 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Helmut Eller Original-Sender: news Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:25:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 5114 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.126002632727391 (code B ref -1); Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:25:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 5 Dec 2009 15:18:47 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nB5FIibp027388 for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 07:18:47 -0800 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NGwPE-0006DP-3E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:18:44 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NGwP8-0006CS-S2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:18:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45080 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NGwP8-0006CP-HP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:18:38 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:59286) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NGwP8-0007Iq-Bd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:18:38 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NGwP6-0002jr-4A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:18:36 +0100 Original-Received: from dial-177248.pool.broadband44.net ([212.46.177.248]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:18:36 +0100 Original-Received: from eller.helmut by dial-177248.pool.broadband44.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:18:36 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dial-177248.pool.broadband44.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:L+g3xBNeSbq9PyfGtgnNP2AT+zA= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:27:49 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:33251 Archived-At: * Eli Zaretskii [2009-12-05 15:25+0100] writes: >> From: Helmut Eller >> Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:36:41 +0100 >> Cc: 5114@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com >> >> + else { >> + unsigned long u = 0; > > This assumes that `unsigned long' is the same width as EMACS_INT. > This could be false, e.g., with 64-bit MS-Windows. Isn't it better to > use EMACS_INT instead? Using EMACS_UINT wouldn't hurt. Does MOST_POSITIVE_FIXNUM not fit in a unsigned long on Windows? I assumed that longs are supposed to be as wide as pointers. Helmut