From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13663: 24.2.93; Why warn `flet' is an obsolete macro at runtime? Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:18:43 +0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360556389 29477 80.91.229.3 (11 Feb 2013 04:19:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 04:19:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13663@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 11 05:20:10 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U4ksC-0004fq-Bc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 05:20:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43565 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4krt-00023U-65 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 23:19:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4krp-00023L-QP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 23:19:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4kro-0001Yp-RN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 23:19:45 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44217) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4kro-0001Yj-NI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 23:19:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4ks6-0001mf-6g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 23:20:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Leo Liu Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 04:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13663 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13663-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13663.13605563506786 (code B ref 13663); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 04:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13663) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2013 04:19:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49681 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4krG-0001lP-3U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 23:19:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-da0-f43.google.com ([209.85.210.43]:33675) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4krE-0001lI-QC for 13663@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 23:19:09 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-da0-f43.google.com with SMTP id u36so2597317dak.16 for <13663@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 20:18:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=1Ac35TAjsHleR8+dkWjgFJ0epuU9ZyDPEh82GvfYox4=; b=BfjGWATPvoGi5Rw70C0ama6f8sAIlP1c8QdBQTr6mF7YeRMkyPBv6OQXKQzD3zv+QA KZ/Eq0FU/VDArG8YgdGW90Gp24gS8mbC1VDKr/qpBwa6IFuy4l9ImfaTCwtx/6exwDqO 0i0drK2WIjiae5M0gcuvSigt874lJdpg1dR8370sentN8CLm+2B6x2Ur2xXxWfkfzX01 43UouUaBcw1Gz0hIeD6iViEKkd1irBcNxPwoQtPC7DkxDxeDjg6AXZzuZ/rEyBopqCyA AWj9Db+yt1Bpq/H2J9TQY7RJUwV60+Es+HSs8e70sIjysHGiJIXDLdBwOT/M4ld/U1xy QkOg== X-Received: by 10.66.89.132 with SMTP id bo4mr38340083pab.62.1360556330179; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 20:18:50 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Shidais-iMac.local ([119.255.41.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t4sm24280795pax.0.2013.02.10.20.18.47 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Feb 2013 20:18:49 -0800 (PST) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAElBMVEUAAAAAAP+LRRP0pGC+ vr7///+7mT1iAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMO DhglKe4AAAEsSURBVCjPbZNBboQwDEV/Cd4X9QJRThApmn0XYW+Jyf2v0m+HhqDBgiAe9rcTG7QH w/1Vn2Ar8gBb/ocywSN3qK9T3z4eFDB4eApocBpeBs1RSykoJd8gQcm8pGmHXFso3ajnmsqV0TnY DQkOfXUfN5NwaI7AWTVOyEhcu1aHmdWItHddUVUcUgUBCkitu8V6ditHVOVdqzl2EQ1ZVGTbdK0V 7cqn8vWzoU5Q/bF9Y/Y0cRU1xwkys5dJ+Dt6pBDWifcNQml8Gh2JVmPSoQzo7en0grswkxrUGYJ7 0hSxxAGr7ZMwYcHIzprpi7TENEE1xtiYxixRlCfPBsUUrwHD7uGIwATrbnODJcVrPpVn3hxiGloe m/S+z3CtuzUSMo83N4DPH+F0evwR3P4A2k+75838OKQAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 09 Feb 2013 21:04:24 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.93 (OS X 10.8.2) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:71041 Archived-At: On 2013-02-10 10:04 +0800, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Good question. Basically, the question is: why is this flet > macro-expanded so late (instead of during byte-compilation)? The problem can not be resolved by recompiling message.el. Looks more serious. Leo