From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Schmitt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: a dark theme? Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 08:36:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87egxkdv74.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> <87tx6fljbp.fsf@debian.uxu> <87tx6f4gny.fsf@debian.uxu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1405665420 28174 80.91.229.3 (18 Jul 2014 06:37:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:37:00 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 18 08:36:53 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X81mm-0007bL-A0 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 08:36:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48284 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X81ml-0000dS-Uc for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 02:36:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58664) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X81mT-0000d6-TG for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 02:36:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X81mO-0001QS-06 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 02:36:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:26647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X81mN-0001Q2-Qb for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 02:36:27 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,682,1400018400"; d="scan'208";a="71908128" Original-Received: from cbg35-2-78-242-14-140.fbx.proxad.net (HELO top.local) ([78.242.14.140]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 18 Jul 2014 08:36:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87tx6f4gny.fsf@debian.uxu> (Emanuel Berg's message of "Fri, 18 Jul 2014 03:08:49 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 192.134.164.104 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:98739 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2014-07-18 03:08, Emanuel Berg writes: > Yeah, but isn't that a contradiction in terms...? If it > is just fetched from the gmail servers and treated like > any other mail, why should you need any killer code at > all? Why isn't the ordinary gnus- and message- faces at > play? But feel free to drop this anytime as I don't use > gmail myself and even my super-human curiosity is > starting to wane... I think the gmail bit is a red herring. These problematic emails are html emails, which are rendering using shr. The gnus faces don't seem to apply in this case, but shr options do. Alan =2D-=20 OpenPGP Key ID : 040D0A3B4ED2E5C7 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTyMBtAAoJEAQNCjtO0uXHdL4IAKYCcsUlQqJvVAd1EvnDT+sn GFTuQeB/RaBgHPgVS5DlhISaMXOGePwHYg95822EzSGixVKhGhhfVh7YOpBAfXAI l27Ey+R+iLk2K4eTCHz7L6NZFXx0yTSZ7Xca8j12tcYMXyvC6G1bWnAzVxKH3kNc hQm+g8Ml7JM4nGCVgLViKNzSVJw2iFGEHSJe/r3fPx1uCIjTL/uIJFSgWN0aATV/ sHzDorVhRJTNIApIEoUDJ5WkrHFteZD3Ega7jRfSFxxsiohnMKqusq0Ea/UQ2Ivt HSHDiFvyqNrNFQxcIvOtJV8zbUemVoRgzY82QUPqfP/rDQsKZCP5IxZCo/7DyNw= =Bshj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--