From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:29:41 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20160916203414.25203.87032@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87shsm7hi6.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83a8eucwi2.fsf@gnu.org> <878tudgwlq.fsf@russet.org.uk> <8360pgoyo4.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1jn3ws9.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83a8eqoi08.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1jlacsh.fsf@russet.org.uk> <867f9t4n4t.fsf@realize.ch> <874m4x8sq5.fsf@russet.org.uk> <8637kh4j1u.fsf@realize.ch> <87wpht4b1i.fsf@russet.org.uk> <86y4292m2u.fsf@realize.ch> <8737kd8vfh.fsf@russet.org.uk> <86bmyz2tt1.fsf@realize.ch> <87int4w341.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87int12rtv.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87y41tekrm.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1476290742 27555 195.159.176.226 (12 Oct 2016 16:45:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:45:42 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (darwin) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Alain Schneble , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 12 18:45:37 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1buMeS-00030k-Jh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:45:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34740 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buMeR-00035Z-7N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:45:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45669) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buMbj-00018P-OJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:42:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buMbh-00068I-Nt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:42:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x242.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::242]:34023) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buMba-00064D-Ri; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:42:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x242.google.com with SMTP id 128so3077162pfz.1; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:42:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=40WS/tWmNLHVmW6xjxsUrUhlsbUbKSNzGhBXnyYpf6E=; b=CHh8DeLlDvHJdvbhWQ6SaWx4xjb5UA53JkBGrlCAm8fh1ChmDnyRtLx0XO2q5XJal9 0buRCIoziOzwKLuVAQc6xw7PfCLvlPE16bf6LaBqyRtHauKKIloHT3s7WNkCjqWkH+WV Ve4+A2I/eWu6HLaZ+SvZoR3RX+ake83Zfl0jnvy3J0KNU5PmGaQ3SHeGA2/TixYqu/oO znOPZ2NExiWqykyIXHb5vdXuIOeYhxgQMXKvBDkN/PQLSCgle9OjL4aVOq9sPpipkhTU qWBxurc8WdMzXC2DLi2/RTK+sTABq4pbY5qCwkH2J28d+SU6m6H2imeGZnRTKcgkp/Dp McCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=40WS/tWmNLHVmW6xjxsUrUhlsbUbKSNzGhBXnyYpf6E=; b=GZ0SMBBkwfB+HrMYizwCz87uYYiuJ+kCjNhBGlCZn3ycqV371AgXXfW2OJTd7Tc6ND zVjnSftDzGT9pNDUKtmnVmrOE9lFnHp9+6Sn6v0nqI2R5X73NNhpV7X6HQ1RQWFd5o/z r3tJAP32qzUU/AYyO4B6nZBqxROHMlEhFx9cMaR3YvsC5j4+m1odpnZpYLweo5uRtAaS jhLDB0HNnRSRZKQmOoNjuyigpOkPC9bpJmzVIpZ53cIi0TGI1Hf+DLkbQCkR2iqPg9OU obSBa33Ld39OQJHYG6IsEA8oYPvGg33aaiDaGZHEKSqHfd9N1AtBAZF30tkAH40ca5+7 ibag== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnBLRAuYL0Zq1pSxIs5ppYAnsgkI+YW2wynm9W/IijqNt5ZHXIaG89WCbVEVDaMJw== X-Received: by 10.99.55.90 with SMTP id g26mr2540324pgn.65.1476290529035; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:42:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-69-149.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.69.149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dj3sm2268877pad.1.2016.10.12.09.42.07 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:42:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 86F762E276DF; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:42:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y41tekrm.fsf@russet.org.uk> (Phillip Lord's message of "Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:53:33 +0100") Mail-Followup-To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord), Alain Schneble , Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::242 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208179 Archived-At: >>>>> "PL" == Phillip Lord writes: >> Yes. Somewhere (probably in a file in Emacs.git), we'd have a MANIFEST file >> to declares which ELPA packages are special with respect to development >> (core ELPA), and which to the distribution (tarball ELPA). It could also >> include other details, such as which Git version we intend to use, where >> the files should be mapped to, etc. PL> Just to be explicit, this means that we have to use git to grab the PL> relevant files from ELPA -- we cannot, for example, use package.el to pull PL> down files from the ELPA website, bcause it doesn't support versions at PL> the moment. That's fine with me for the present time. PL> All makes sense, but still a bit confused about how we would decide PL> whether a package would be tarball or core. What would the criteria be? Whatever the developers here decide. Someone will propose that a package be included, and we'll agree or disagree on each point. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2