From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39082: Inconsolata v3.000 has too wide spacing Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:43:14 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83eew47kix.fsf@gnu.org> <83d0bo7gwn.fsf@gnu.org> <83a76s7eaf.fsf@gnu.org> <838smc7bwn.fsf@gnu.org> <83zher5nyt.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="13049"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: greselin.andrea@gmail.com, 39082@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 13 17:46:58 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ir2p9-000m3N-3q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:44:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52826 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ir2p7-0001Cv-Jt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:44:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55479) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ir2ot-000179-66 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:44:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ir2os-00070u-0S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:44:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ir2or-00070O-SG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:44:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ir2or-0001Cf-Qa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:44:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 16:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39082 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39082-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39082.15789338054570 (code B ref 39082); Mon, 13 Jan 2020 16:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39082) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2020 16:43:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59945 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ir2oH-0001Be-Az for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:43:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com ([209.85.221.53]:34767) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ir2oG-0001BR-8l for 39082@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:43:24 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id t2so9330486wrr.1 for <39082@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 08:43:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Tf2VZjIX2BKQdDFdOZIoL/bL3IbhS9JcV+DxfM9sP7g=; b=AxWzJumxmruYb10lgzF/VbjUB5Zdsc2OXuyoJwD4CPig3SuzOx80Ijnlx9SwdSOiSF kGELdxYztCnrEnFpHrAfkdIl+632ld1M05e5QM8p6gsIhPDRuMNwHgBfLTMAxPmrrSLd olBJgazgyzqGlkX3CY8CtLQx8YGpK9rI2Ax1ZU+4RpABzkgJaaMbwIQgWMyIL9dCaDHG QFicNf5VPkzGiJNunM570eg3drfZ79i3Al0rGeALqoCHhBNaFWp4qyTzhz5FfwAAdICA rtWqHLFO9tpY5UrqbU3hVd31SVY9dOVRkF1S0K8gJdK/bEfhmK67Udtx33FmsfBFHqmm pwGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Tf2VZjIX2BKQdDFdOZIoL/bL3IbhS9JcV+DxfM9sP7g=; b=XQ5VCa1D6h3DAo7Jjtrc/JhcB9NsQNKe5NkIbEUsP5Dz25fCUyhu44G7jieUjYlwrS d8AeT18W/zdvjbDl96qy4Lb8EN13WTCdsKyzpfP11uABDtFhKTmMpIdXqUKoUQ5Ugk5o TP+/GX8GGEBmLwNpbKl1jEZ+a9pEP+7onyj2Z1tQNxGbr5IoEbLHAyydSf/zX0r/e+lm TMYMWVBEve4k31RodScFnAFcnOnxGFVR0Q67m5Wt1y07TNfOYdjrKt/qMatVH6DgIhyg qyn6bwf4uoaTBHBptX4j1pBMvhEk/rIzfwj/IVu0FFAG1VvpbOwoi4CtevO7v5FvIq8s SaHg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWmb0tr0Qve/cOpcXeFHJ3yLBDjpLDFrnyy57TB4i6hdBPxqc+0 H5dQAJymBUc2JK+rCfNriYgIN8Kn X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw4ysNpJwNBA4PuwH5bR7OuB7FFCum2ouB4+5lf+r2AFjdj0MBefyxQM6vZXYoUbtLaSwfj1A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f990:: with SMTP id f16mr20028658wrr.185.1578933797972; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 08:43:17 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from rpluim-mac ([149.5.228.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s8sm15274091wrt.57.2020.01.13.08.43.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 13 Jan 2020 08:43:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83zher5nyt.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 13 Jan 2020 18:18:50 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:174536 Archived-At: >>>>> On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 18:18:50 +0200, Eli Zaretskii said: >> From: Robert Pluim >> Cc: Andrea Greselin , 39082@debbugs.gnu.= org >> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:27:32 +0100 >>=20 Eli> So the question now becomes how come we get such a large value. L= ooks Eli> like we somehow use the space-width value instead of the character Eli> glyph's width, not sure why. I guess stepping through the code I'= ve Eli> shown from xdisp.c is still necessary to understand this. >>=20 >> I can reproduce this, but I don=CA=BCt know how much effort we shoul= d spend >> getting to the bottom of it: a Cairo-enabled build (ie !XFT) does not >> have this problem. Eli> So I guess this is some kind of Xft bug? In that case, I think it Eli> would be enough to describe the Cairo workaround in etc/PROBLEMS, = and Eli> close the bug with that. It=CA=BCs either a bug or a limitation in the Xft interface. I see the width of characters coming back from XftGlyphExtents as 26, with all the other metrics as 0, so I don=CA=BCt think there=CA=BCs much we can do. Andrea, does building emacs-27 configure '--with-cairo' fix this for you? Robert