From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Filipp Gunbin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: process-file instead of call-process in proced.el? Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 18:40:27 +0300 Message-ID: References: <835yo2cyj9.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8w2b9wn.fsf@gnu.org> <87tubmi7b5.fsf@gmx.de> <83r16qb59e.fsf@gnu.org> <87mthei17b.fsf@gmx.de> <87ee2qhzq3.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11343"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (darwin) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , winkler@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 25 16:41:55 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nXm4Y-0002gK-59 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 16:41:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58622 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXm4W-0002Sy-Il for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:41:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46056) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXm3I-0001F4-EG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:40:37 -0400 Original-Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:33775) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXm3G-0002l7-F9; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:40:36 -0400 Original-Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859F73200974; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:40:31 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:40:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; bh=/ZXuyQ/dlVyKzEGEshuCX9zt0UZgGsq4QJ4loW gbFe0=; b=c/5LP5yLC7Amro8wNh7peBRF9eHFYBM9S3+zMJ7EKFvyQ9rYHcaVua oq/+cfESsAGwEjery+nrP6WhYZfkZe5hIiSZGWAFRWzW1CRh84vFscHoGxfSTTjc AgE4dL3V6A0JR8LIZ4J/ubT9dUNjklBGA52n0TLLqgoeQQaErT7liR2FbLjxqQKa AVPCACbwFixxQySG/fNn7KxMVnbEC0byUARx+qQuWyBpmd2yt850RtyJew+R+xkn 0zLxVFQAIqRbIj54v6MO0NcvgBV5Y70IKPpIig+QgHHGWbrBlXsaITyZl+8gEL1E tPhGpMUXqaommecy0SrCbYfphu1+bRgw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=/ZXuyQ/dlVyKzEGEs huCX9zt0UZgGsq4QJ4loWgbFe0=; b=lbVYxBfQKMcGxD4wMQf/DCQAxE0Mx4I4Y BWVUAqyaEd35KuR6Q0QIhlByB7Xv+qIu/oOdK3YmVie9DXkocA2fdERnYV6pXuJn Ac00ygKfcZ2KbxJC+ltjQCS3jJhhRl3h0OLtKRav2BjDgpR1aGc4A6DUywYX7NuG esYRvVwAh7Qb2l8M5Vaz8rCkrq92v9XjNqZ8tm9UZsHjYZvvK1kqxDiKpojJrjhn 1rdZ6hrn+dh6Do9dALa/oo3/E3jisAUMRWibEDJubtsuS2A8+GUmoUNq0jEAuBob gC+7rCvmi7uGe1niH2GIqtqlFtOWZ72UqZoUqAEU3bG74Y/PzqLYA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrudehuddgjeelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufgjfhgffffkgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefhihhlihhp phcuifhunhgsihhnuceofhhguhhnsghinhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmheqnecuggftrf grthhtvghrnhepvdevkeffvdeuvefhuddtjeehkedvueefveettddtveduudfgieffieev ieevhfdtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomh epfhhguhhnsghinhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:40:29 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87ee2qhzq3.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:29:56 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.24; envelope-from=fgunbin@fastmail.fm; helo=wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:287458 Archived-At: On 25/03/2022 15:29 +0100, Michael Albinus wrote: > Filipp Gunbin writes: > >> Currently, there is a reason - signal-process is not remote-host aware >> :-) Also there may be other systems on which it does not work for other >> reasons. I mean, if the support for user-specified command is there, >> and we don't want to remove it (do we?), then why not fix it, in >> parallel with improving signal-process? > > My proposal is to remove the user-specified command, yes. There's no > need for it. > > Best regards, Michael. So what is best to do now? Leave it alone until you or someone else improve signal-process? Thanks Filipp