From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Pettersson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69241: Fixed patch issues Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:48:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: <86msr7ye9h.fsf@gnu.org> <86edcgvrp1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30435"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 69241@debbugs.gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 11 15:48:53 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rjgxR-0007dj-6J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:48:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjgx4-0004sh-21; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:48:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjgx2-0004sL-NS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:48:28 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjgx2-0004VY-F2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:48:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rjgxZ-0003dB-Vx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Daniel Pettersson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 14:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69241 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 69241-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69241.171016852713864 (code B ref 69241); Mon, 11 Mar 2024 14:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69241) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Mar 2024 14:48:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40976 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rjgxK-0003bW-Jl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:48:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-f50.google.com ([209.85.167.50]:49322) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rjgxH-0003ag-Rr for 69241@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:48:45 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-f50.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-51344bebe2fso2975081e87.2 for <69241@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:48:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710168484; x=1710773284; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=R8VN4MhqIzab9AC1V5rt/QVJJ1aXsp7/z7oeZiyoPaY=; b=FT/4Buq+dd2rujAug71JyAE8ubuD6aovs/EONBo5M3ZhyFKfFEGkNUpmfpzWqvA/DL +P1TBMzoiSMNLhsK59t6rUvPDyqKeW+2I9fvCx7EJ6C3ZJB9X9Ut3yiDnseP2kRJ2JEs mYn/brbgiZ5RL9NjONPb8N1h8/kggxIu5WfDEYf8YU4Rrwpdkc2FwONyF56GiudWfK0T q9UN9ryJ9holaQ/5b/ULdiOv0TV4zaSvUGYfGu2jW4E6s9zG1h6AH3Njrk4CwLGhESVP ++KqJ3N4B8DHVRUh27VirgqauMvlWyMm+EvW3YziOSYUK3Cb5KXsXfHvBKju+kWf3S0q pn2g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUPQO/LHyH+5ATPSzGaB23v0DV+rSGNvxaC8DfUcl4LTgUdkWVfxyb54/p3/vlwHydYYUrZH10JJlGoh26hWDL/bxgHsDU= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwIvfxFRu8Yg1IjokkkSr4063HTTbzeBN6ba1sI8zBqZFrdvYgB DwkWi0Yvv71h2WpZrf/+qWcGIGQwWTnmYxXdGIEcRfRSY5PCffgR9i82pbLJ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEbQfJeff0IctaOmlqTh4pVRgs7WdYo9SIlktEf+tWlkSVbkcsY7KMb76cn617ieG0dPcKfog== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3996:b0:513:4afa:a719 with SMTP id j22-20020a056512399600b005134afaa719mr6405376lfu.59.1710168483762; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:48:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Daniels-Air (c-72cde455.027-357-6d6c6d4.bbcust.telenor.se. [85.228.205.114]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f7-20020a05651201c700b00513a7b47c75sm597711lfp.93.2024.03.11.07.48.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:48:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86edcgvrp1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:11:38 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:281476 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Can't the code activate the timers in reverse order? Then each > timer--activate will likely compare with just one timer, the first > one. In my patch they do. As all timers are using the same time list and pushed on timer-list in the correct order. Feels like *I* have pushed this thread into bikeshedding territory :) > Timers must fire in the order of their time, so they must be kept > sorted, or else running the timer functions and removing the timer > from the list will be much more complex. > > Assuming that timers are sorted is not relying on the internals, if > you ask me. Great, what actions do I need to take to move forward with this maintainership thing? /Daniel