From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "John Wiegley" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cl-pushnew and other functions Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:04:31 -0500 Organization: New Artisans LLC Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341378283 3313 80.91.229.3 (4 Jul 2012 05:04:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 05:04:43 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 04 07:04:43 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SmHla-0003s8-AF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 07:04:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40473 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SmHlZ-0001YX-1z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:04:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56403) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SmHlW-0001YR-1Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:04:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SmHlU-0007Y2-Ef for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:04:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:37669) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SmHlU-0007Xs-8B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:04:36 -0400 Original-Received: by yenr5 with SMTP id r5so7069654yen.0 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 22:04:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:organization:references:mail-followup-to :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=nf73fLJwZLi0g12o45b/ZOr+blnyKDmY0Vm4lHgEHik=; b=dKttSWg3vj7VWd4Pxa6Mpd3oUGkKZb1kMbAvcKOV//H2a2gtXLCapUUHkBrsJzPFjR V/ZIKkRzqJjv73QO5Z/ljDG0orelcrS6sNbsngmVLlSnDGP754u3mhNoecyxu1feItQ1 E3L0binl51z6lj67U8QIcuJJ0W9iGZ42zt5EW8k/EaiuhvoPfqBZymS9V2RQBtlzM/gO IdoUUy7bRMPnGJzHul0N4OfG2ApiAjNp6HoFnrPS7/ngI0oCAqyu73BeAzKuUKsH4iBx gC2hH+ek4ta7D/A7HIn6ERFpTwiffDzKPQMNT//wThePpB92sdfvCdDMk9pNWzyOjpUv uKhw== Original-Received: by 10.50.188.131 with SMTP id ga3mr10622390igc.54.1341378274309; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 22:04:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Hermes.local (71-82-213-197.dhcp.mdsn.wi.charter.com. [71.82.213.197]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v17sm28042359igv.7.2012.07.03.22.04.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 03 Jul 2012 22:04:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by Hermes.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 41E5120A5543; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 00:04:31 -0500 (CDT) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 30 Jun 2012 00:16:30 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.1 (darwin) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.213.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151406 Archived-At: >>>>> Stefan Monnier writes: > Because I don't want to simply adopt all those Common-Lisp-isms into Elisp. > A big reason for that is that Elisp is not compiled aggressively, so some > design choices in Common-Lisp would be too costly in Elisp. Is it considered kosher yet to use cl.el's defun*? I *really* miss keyword arguments in Elisp. John