From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13594: 24.2.92; [PATCH] compilation-start doesn't consider nil OUTWIN Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:22:49 +0800 Message-ID: References: <87sj5apclq.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87r4ktoinh.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87mwvhxehw.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87zjzfz0nq.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <51161554.9010609@gmx.at> <8738x4o5cp.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <5117D9B5.5090203@gmx.at> <87pq07b4k4.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <51192ADD.9010607@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360830218 21082 80.91.229.3 (14 Feb 2013 08:23:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13594@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 14 09:23:59 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U5u6n-00088g-Dv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:23:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59719 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5u6T-0004uG-Pq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:23:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51837) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5u6L-0004t3-Db for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:23:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5u6I-0007zH-PX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:23:29 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49559) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5u6I-0007zC-MG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:23:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U5u6s-0006UU-3H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:24:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Leo Liu Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13594 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 13594-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13594.136083021824894 (code B ref 13594); Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13594) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2013 08:23:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55023 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U5u6S-0006TM-JH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:23:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:34964) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U5u6P-0006T6-Bg for 13594@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:23:34 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id hz1so1203468pad.10 for <13594@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:22:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=ETcZ3mfo9O2JkOMUo7kxBZZAQ+32shVPn+dRWFlmK3M=; b=YYYX9px61bX8p677I9g2O28Zq+BZf3lORJGmzlpJDuUiTxzBrHbitWQDgDQp1G4R89 qJKKQ39GyCxnDTnkrwIc39DlP6kh1xadwvLDkc0jnCA6J6Ms8rz2i7aXw2grCa6PKG2P 63f07zOGh1QYeMc2OWd3uChZwJfKFBY8q/zJbY2zDEC9D4FeL7xhjgMpYmcfRwSnpyVv tOAbH/SRW1Qu02R6VYuenGNp51gmRKNqIK16PrSOhmBEBeWQNj7yQXl0yNdQ/No0Nrbx 4E17ypJ6MQvzKQhwUh2jGa2U6fRjx7bJsGqwks5d5s+1k3ZJUJB40lZEQ8wQj8HBRSFb mtcA== X-Received: by 10.68.204.68 with SMTP id kw4mr1583060pbc.113.1360830176571; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:22:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Shidais-iMac.local ([119.255.41.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ix6sm608038pbc.17.2013.02.14.00.22.52 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:22:54 -0800 (PST) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAGFBMVEUKDAg1NjRWV1V9fnyg op/DxcLk5uP8/voi63ReAAAACXBIWXMAAAWJAAAFiQFtaJ36AAAAB3RJTUUH1goZAgAz00bgXgAA AeVJREFUKM9lk0Fz2jAQhQXJD3CCO70CmcC1YMtcWyTZ14Bl69xats4N9r6/3zWQBlodNKNPu/s0 b1cCQFuZGpfVVh3vAvBJolIXRkapSuoRUtIdFyo1Y5xSdlAj7OtvD1XnXxmWRi+eWgcxyCed1lVV B1CrKyujMoi+eLA5kU1SsjoHlW+nQjTtFxk4MXgrOxvIqzoTZR8XgPaLl419zgsMaSGFPiUOZCIh thsx5Xy9NsK8Kwf/JoQgMxcVJ301HKkcSWaT0O7FY056J4U9xcYfnmVXG4801lW6lqwu2nKFZoHC HuzvaTVndZ+LaRQgZdthXw1cpynEkLEwyFHXk/aIxNQ6QeooJuzPMB+wn+D7JJNsiCcVA13/A3h/ xE9J+WidpAwoYNmRFwyvSRhNVtsdaAewzZZP5uw82QL9+tyNfocyP0McAzICUr5Mk9RdIjWasUNx aIIt6NK4ZtXIMdfMQt3nuMAyWbLI4DqZ4xPq/ag8jPond4XU/cLuOgw6XCFX/YCUfcDAMMH58fD4 G9kDchwfqVefkBwup2uZM+Q4WhJt5jN3AxXCsaS2yXEDuWgS8VOzW0gFjhEPmLyFMKBFaLb1HRwc DiaKwx0EeTMRYnYPQRW3PP4HApvlMv0PttX5v/D6Aws3IOSEwzmLAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Tue, 12 Feb 2013 01:55:08 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.93 (OS X 10.8.2) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:71255 Archived-At: On 2013-02-12 01:55 +0800, Leo Liu wrote: > What happens if we just return a minibuffer window to display-buffer? > (still ugly as hell) Have we reached an impasse? Is it advisable to go back to what Stefan originally suggested? Cheers, Leo