From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: EWW bugs should be fixed on emacs-25 branch Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:53:22 -0800 Message-ID: References: <8337urm0cv.fsf@gnu.org> <83ziwzkl50.fsf@gnu.org> <87lh8jvsqh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83si2qliho.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1tulaa1.fsf@gnu.org> <838u4il3jf.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4cijo24.fsf@gnu.org> <83twn6jm7e.fsf@gnu.org> <83poxujlva.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451076833 1263 80.91.229.3 (25 Dec 2015 20:53:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 20:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, dak@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 25 21:53:47 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aCZMw-0004gP-CQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 21:53:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36435 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCZMv-0003Qe-Mf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 15:53:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47718) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCZMk-0003QY-1x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 15:53:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCZMi-00020g-SA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 15:53:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]:33501) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCZMc-000201-A1; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 15:53:26 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id q63so47715521pfb.0; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:53:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=Yz6T29tQN2ABfEGOCoBMjbsSvGf/YxUPzOhitVL2x9M=; b=Ml9rVbs6GDFC1MAu1SsLXvR0/EUoLs2oRUmYm0hhmFePeXJREqrY+vsBa5WU6x1eWR gLlULhAfTSVUSaE30/TgcwdpGeuxpm6jEIPGV3u+z0bKDBPMjQ9zq8K1P2zOThVsLpGy 5T4VWL9FJQEV+/fiQDTS7iX7XSlA/CS31Ra8F01HrIOXQtIEReRfR+lXa5Faw/0Q+H7M tpAKzvdiy5vtWb1ArrIpcQ6bCZxRyVgD2GmfowmtdP8Hi5Q04D9nkE/33pwI2bpHyno8 WDJQKZbRCPtiwBWG9QX9t8otwMIk0CE8IXrKkrrquLvOqukBTuPrKz7kTZB0kWSIVUHq uV2w== X-Received: by 10.98.89.27 with SMTP id n27mr31608454pfb.70.1451076805701; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:53:25 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id xi8sm66116212pab.9.2015.12.25.12.53.24 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:53:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 084D411B4F3C8; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:53:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83poxujlva.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 25 Dec 2015 22:48:09 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , dak@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196868 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > I very much doubt that you interact with GDB in GDB/MI. Most probably, you > use CLI, which is a different language and a different interpreter in GDB. Ah, true enough. >> OK, but once I understand what exactly is being done, there may in fact be >> better ways to do it. > If there are better ways, we should improve gitmerge.el to use them. Ok, that sounds like a good idea. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2