From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: repost of 'make bootstrap' problem Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 13:48:36 -0600 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: References: <87ir3wodst.fsf@lifelogs.com> <86lk8fs4r1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <86fxy580db.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <86r6h2vayo.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <87lk7afi3p.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199217052 25981 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2008 19:50:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 19:50:52 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 01 20:51:12 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J9n8j-0001rK-Vp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 20:51:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J9n8O-0005sF-9F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 14:50:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J9n8K-0005qj-R5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 14:50:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J9n8H-0005op-It for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 14:50:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J9n8H-0005om-DM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 14:50:37 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J9n8H-0006r7-2m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 14:50:37 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J9n7W-0004vr-S9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 19:49:50 +0000 Original-Received: from c-67-186-103-18.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([67.186.103.18]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 19:49:50 +0000 Original-Received: from tzz by c-67-186-103-18.hsd1.il.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 19:49:50 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 28 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-67-186-103-18.hsd1.il.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1.50 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:zG5sKvUdxd7bBTgwYlGrDHnhnsI= X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:85815 Archived-At: On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 02:30:02 +0100 Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote: TN> () Ted Zlatanov TN> () Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:57:35 -0600 TN> Reposting TZ> if (XINT (end) != st.st_size TZ> || ((int) st.st_size * 4) / 4 != st.st_size) TZ> /* extra parameters added by me */ TZ> error ("Maximum buffer size exceeded: XINT(end)=%d, st.st_size=%d", XINT(end), st.st_size); TN> it looks like you may have missed this change: TN> 2007-12-16 Andreas Schwab TN> * fileio.c (Finsert_file_contents): Fix overflow TN> check to not depend on undefined integer overflow. TN> does that give good results? I did my report on 2007-12-31 with a clean (cvs up -A) checkout from CVS to a new directory. Unfortunately it was still failing. I think it's a system-level problem, though, since a) no one else has seen it, and b) it happens BEFORE any data is read from the file (as I explained in my earlier post). Ted