From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Compiling Elisp to a native code with a GCC plugin Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:11:43 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87bp805ecr.fsf@gmail.com> <87bp7zhu0j.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <8739tbhsiz.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284671540 20508 80.91.229.12 (16 Sep 2010 21:12:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:12:20 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 16 23:12:19 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwLkX-0006Y6-A6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:12:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39498 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OwLkV-00023B-Jv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:12:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51514 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OwLkO-00021L-Qd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwLkF-0008Oz-23 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:11:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:51252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwLkE-0008O0-TY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:11:51 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2E81C00234 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:11:43 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-108-0.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.108.0]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72241C002F9 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:11:43 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id 75C2ECA299; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:11:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: I think I'll do BOTH if I can get RESIDUALS!! In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:58:04 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130271 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > David Kastrup writes: > >> Lars sounds like he would be better served with looking-at getting an >> optional "LITERAL" argument making it do its job without involving the >> regexp machinery. > > Yes, a LITERAL option to `looking-at' would make sense. IMHO it should be good enough to teach looking-at to recognize trivial regexps. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."