From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Martyn Jago Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 23:24:57 +0100 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1336515919 18922 80.91.229.3 (8 May 2012 22:25:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 22:25:19 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 09 00:25:19 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SRsqL-0004wh-I7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 00:25:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56884 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRsqK-000420-Sj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 18:25:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45177) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRsqH-00041v-Uv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 18:25:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRsqG-0000Zl-7S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 18:25:13 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38431) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRsqG-0000Zd-1N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 18:25:12 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SRsqC-0004uP-UJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 00:25:08 +0200 Original-Received: from 88-96-171-142.dsl.zen.co.uk ([88.96.171.142]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 00:25:08 +0200 Original-Received: from martyn.jago by 88-96-171-142.dsl.zen.co.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 00:25:08 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 40 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 88-96-171-142.dsl.zen.co.uk User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:JUr+SpbgdFoiwR06U25EJLrLzn0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150378 Archived-At: Nice diversion about the ugliness of Org-mode code delimitation. In the mean time, wouldn't it be prudent to answer the OP's question? ..." Hi, it seem C-M-x is not working as expected in a `lexical-binding' enabled buffer: #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp ;; -*- lexical-binding: t -*- (defun foo () (declare (special bar)) (let ((bar 2) (baz 3)) #'(lambda () (+ bar baz)))) ;; I expect this: ;; (funcall (foo)) ;;=>Symbol's value as variable is void: bar #+END_SRC However, (funcall (foo)) return 5 until I byte-compile and load the file. So my question is how do you evaluate such code when working in a `lexical-binding' enabled buffer? Thanks. Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997 "