From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Move initialization to compile time Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:51:14 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83fw8tawux.fsf@gnu.org> <83ehodats4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1342371083 16527 80.91.229.3 (15 Jul 2012 16:51:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 16:51:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dmantipov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 15 18:51:23 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SqS2U-0003o1-Ns for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:51:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33102 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SqS2U-0002V3-5H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:51:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59188) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SqS2R-0002Um-HK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:51:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SqS2Q-00081B-OX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:51:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:54918) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SqS2P-00080p-7L; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:51:17 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend4.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3WZv1s6JTQz4KK6c; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:52:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-111-94.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.111.94]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3WZv0M4nPNzbbcW; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:51:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4A66FCA2A3; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:51:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: Hand me a pair of leather pants and a CASIO keyboard -- I'm living for today! In-Reply-To: <83ehodats4.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:11:39 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 212.18.0.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151630 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andreas Schwab >> Cc: Dmitry Antipov , emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:02:54 +0200 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> > AFAIK, this moves interval_block_index from the .bss section to .data >> > section. >> >> Why is that a problem? > > I didn't say it was. But since (AFAIK) one of them is shared, while > the other isn't, Both .data and .bss are writable, so I don't see how you come to that conclusion. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."