From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Helmut Eller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: UI inconveniences with M-. Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 11:50:48 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83zja6b3tc.fsf@gnu.org> <553EBBBF.6070509@yandex.ru> <838udcwbdc.fsf@gnu.org> <553FFC99.5080701@yandex.ru> <834mnzuedd.fsf@gnu.org> <554161A8.30202@yandex.ru> <83618du3q3.fsf@gnu.org> <5542E486.2010107@yandex.ru> <83k2wsssm8.fsf@gnu.org> <5543632C.6000306@yandex.ru> <834mnwsbfb.fsf@gnu.org> <554392E2.7080109@yandex.ru> <83oam4qh2u.fsf@gnu.org> <5543C97C.6050000@yandex.ru> <83h9rwqf10.fsf@gnu.org> <5543E3CF.5010402@yandex.ru> <83wq0rpe3u.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3qzpc1c.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430560264 25175 80.91.229.3 (2 May 2015 09:51:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 09:51:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 02 11:51:03 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YoU4a-0003CD-Sw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 May 2015 11:51:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56515 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YoU4a-0000Kz-D2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 May 2015 05:51:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46983) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YoU4X-0000Iw-1Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2015 05:50:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YoU4W-0003Cv-Ap for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2015 05:50:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]:34885) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YoU4R-0003BR-PC; Sat, 02 May 2015 05:50:51 -0400 Original-Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so74058217wid.0; Sat, 02 May 2015 02:50:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=fq3WWDcityY9giu2pZLdIMzrqz967jjeYSZdc4Gkv/I=; b=Cydb8ZWSnzJBg6XfvPeoF+0BxtAxNOELJPvVe0tw4zMK1NnEEeyV57VmbeSHSrGGgJ hAY66UJW2lTvlY1mCoeYQleNgsyv49tEyYtkgv+mekql+UZyPtRQ0FOvx2+SPQmiNAwP bS9bYMgJb/n8mQaBwv8JAIzGp+uBM89aLUJdxUucU1U9QIASdHVpNApdaM8If5B9YjkT hl5+UdP3R4G98LTpvJuGOHknJdy8Y9/IzhUxS+K12PYxWy/qzejT0ggJkQyYBnoAY6gn HByjaJYDDxtl7D8TqXggxREZ5mfeJoOXUq+35m5dYF7w7DSwxJKHUO6NdeTcygerVxW0 lQvA== X-Received: by 10.180.216.103 with SMTP id op7mr3731488wic.90.1430560251074; Sat, 02 May 2015 02:50:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ix ([212.46.170.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g14sm11058420wjs.47.2015.05.02.02.50.49 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 02 May 2015 02:50:49 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from helmut by ix with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YoU4O-0000b5-FW; Sat, 02 May 2015 11:50:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83r3qzpc1c.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 02 May 2015 12:24:31 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186132 Archived-At: On Sat, May 02 2015, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Would the > users mind that, say, forward-line is separated from forward-paragraph? It seems the me that etags users were very satisfied with the order in which find-tag returned the results. Helmut