From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: checkdoc-package-keywords and "M-x checkdoc" Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 15:12:14 -0800 Message-ID: References: <83fuzsviag.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3it8kub.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449962013 9370 80.91.229.3 (12 Dec 2015 23:13:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 23:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ohwoeowho@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 13 00:13:26 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a7tLx-0008R1-21 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 00:13:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53298 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7tLw-0007zU-4N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 18:13:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47291) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7tLV-0007yF-7W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 18:12:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7tLU-0007Es-BE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 18:12:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]:33416) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7tLS-0007E9-Fl; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 18:12:54 -0500 Original-Received: by pabur14 with SMTP id ur14so84126921pab.0; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 15:12:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=5B5en8vJWrs5ntHReceKamLyQTH12mji6um13NZZ8hM=; b=nqHYvv1G6aHDBJP1Z323ztkhj2ujiH9fY/7KFF0HS8mZNY7AtoVMIdx2QP45De4HHJ tPuU04zegJhq3WEI3YgEUNi7JzdR8S3HS+Ni8XJandu9TPZ1tGPfKS5zruF5iA4Sb1qr jjGsIVSQs41SEZHQSo+ydAhGGQxsbPcaHn9CjeDfb19KF9rhkxvA0LzsHRNfskFoGNnY jotXBciAryirkBLuxKjeZAIOsTUwrRko7XIczrbNtDPntI5eyqdnxJTuQTMchGwOn3o3 5IhfI5Ta+ejQwaiV4Yp2Gbnt8UrgkSUZVpsCDVVp7QX7Trbr2hXAzvzev74m8pY/eWQg rhig== X-Received: by 10.66.90.194 with SMTP id by2mr35250456pab.2.1449961974058; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 15:12:54 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h9sm33232615pfj.69.2015.12.12.15.12.50 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 12 Dec 2015 15:12:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8FE3111463704; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 15:12:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83r3it8kub.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:12:44 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , ohwoeowho@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196180 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> The new variable checkdoc-package-keywords seems not to affect what >> "M-x checkdoc" checks, only "M-x checkdoc-current-buffer" and commands >> that call it. I think this is inconsistency is confusing. Can we >> please extend the effect of that variable so that it covers 'checkdoc' >> itself as well? I'm in support of this change. =2D-=20 John Wiegley GPG fingerprint =3D 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJWbKnOAAoJEMFE2PTxn+YwknML/RtPQSpuFSjjgdvNrrTPPrnE HK3zztcXf9mCUY5owxHTN4zTlfvsPR2kMVO6TetKE81Pebcflx+0nWTm8Ian2bDr gH7TPzs8LlcbAOTA/H+7c5GTp/dJ8R8nCT5NODXvzIWrKlTg6sUqbkfi3FUByxCg DJaQu5dr9kt5fl0FVQZ6C/rLHXpX900YRX8jIMY8J+xncRJEWyrm6+Tc+hSge3po 8BVO1DQaENBRS++7t8MG+dvb5URfSB6z8p5vuk+VVM7gMlocMaMaDbBlKXYA9GtN M18PV1LXV4tVf+YCNCUI/yeGeiLxI9WN1nqn1rBpV11rYhllcVdYn5JfyYOrsh3V Pfi8dSDa98pONhtO8wMCj8s/3sKeXfx2QpT2DRP14mBuPiKYPxsQuErNS7rst5In 1fFAQexFoSq7OV4gsqgrVMrvLFdORe28cDEQ/1xAgpZLAsafR/N7+kaMm/C+viwy BTYH5ZnYHuzTTW/DDrItnjUE+yRfL5QJJR9w8GnmPA== =A6TR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--