From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] scratch/follow e8937ed: Replace GROUP argument in six window primitives by new functions. Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:43:12 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20151214165252.26784.43201@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20151215131539.GA5018@acm.fritz.box> <8737v3fbqj.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <20151217221445.GD1888@acm.fritz.box> <87zix863aw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1450399422 24505 80.91.229.3 (18 Dec 2015 00:43:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 18 01:43:33 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a9j8v-0005Bn-Dj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 01:43:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57826 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9j8u-00043X-Qi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 19:43:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41712) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9j8i-00043M-1z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 19:43:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9j8e-0006QZ-Sc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 19:43:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::235]:33846) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9j8e-0006QO-Mr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 19:43:16 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id 68so39252102pfc.1 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:43:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=qqzLrQb9Ch+WFz8k2ti+I6185usXeJ7tg/ap83ylsmc=; b=rcOtbUnQIpuP1du/ZZAn6eTk6xsiTHXM8BK4xoCDd83T3+HAAqnqD4UV+sqVd/Do8j 1QPnOPt+3n68HZug2C0FCgO6ADC0hnPVj2jND1aC+l4ByxwOSwTLIR07xwR7R93VMYM0 W5TW2YBFvM3FIGIdI+NyI9BeWNPJw/mD1qtWJY5o+sxBnsEjrd9bVL913auYxB7VPtR+ CDVxTa3SxSEJsA6nEIWB3VqBz9xTI0FmVGxxxutQ1zHYMEEkn8SofNWmFpKARy0UtiFD XbIF7dupTje+uLNhZLHFZz0NH+i23f3NnrdHAfdceCD65KUwT7iPBuDPohXJ64sJmjhD bJ9g== X-Received: by 10.98.64.201 with SMTP id f70mr1021534pfd.147.1450399396101; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:43:16 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h10sm18161378pat.7.2015.12.17.16.43.15 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:43:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id A13CF11971049; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:43:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87zix863aw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Fri, 18 Dec 2015 01:52:39 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Juri Linkov , Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196443 Archived-At: >>>>> Juri Linkov writes: >> I think it would have to be `recenter-window-group', but is >> `recenter-group' really that ambiguous? People have no problem with >> `recenter', which, if anything, is even more ambiguous. > I don't know why `recenter' is not `recenter-window' like other existing > functions e.g. `reposition-window'. Maybe for historical reasons. But > `recenter-group' will add more ambiguity: recenter what? what group? I prefer recenter-window-group. And maybe we should have `recenter-window' as an alias for `recenter', just for consistency. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2