From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "John Wiegley" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [Emacs-diffs] scratch/widen-less a4ab846: Replace prog-widen with consolidating widen calls Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 13:39:02 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20171129233237.27462.23351@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20171201223529.GG3840@ACM> <4a94ec5c-efdd-50f1-ff4d-277f5f45c2df@yandex.ru> <83lgil1qme.fsf@gnu.org> <83d13x1j2s.fsf@gnu.org> <34abea95-c7f7-e8fa-8407-8c2fd2a4cfe1@yandex.ru> <83y3mkzw1n.fsf@gnu.org> <83mv2zzv7z.fsf@gnu.org> <83o9nexy48.fsf@gnu.org> <83d13uxug5.fsf@gnu.org> <41e3f343-816f-d2db-6575-6ef43d54957f@yandex.ru> <838tecuqjb.fsf@gnu.org> <83609etizl.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1512941995 9277 195.159.176.226 (10 Dec 2017 21:39:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 21:39:55 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (darwin) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, Dmitry Gutov To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 10 22:39:51 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eO9KA-0002CC-RV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:39:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49837 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eO9KI-0002pc-35 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:39:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34421) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eO9JY-0002pG-Qy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:39:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eO9JT-0008EF-TL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:39:12 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53955) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eO9JT-0008E5-Q0; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:39:07 -0500 Original-Received: from auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.228]:60623) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eO9JT-0000rL-6f; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:39:07 -0500 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6500F2081D; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:39:06 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:39:06 -0500 X-ME-Sender: Original-Received: from localhost (76-234-69-149.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net [76.234.69.149]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E570D24E84; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:39:05 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83609etizl.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:39:58 +0200") Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Dmitry Gutov , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220860 Archived-At: >>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii writes: EZ> Forget all the messages. Forget the politics. There are only 2 questions EZ> that need to be answered: Can you modify your branch such that it doesn't EZ> remove prog-indentation-context, doesn't replace prog-widen with widen, EZ> and leaves prog-first-column as a function? And if so, can the resulting EZ> changeset allow reasonable MMM-style multi-mode support in Emacs? Thanks for the pointer to past discussions Dmitry, that's very helpful. In this case, though, I'd like to second Eli and have us just move forward. I'm a bit less opposed to "putting it out there" as I was when I wrote the message you linked to. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2