From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan J Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: bug#2530: 23/NS: redraws according to mouse-face are slow Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:34:22 +0000 Message-ID: References: <4383E9F6-9B66-4DA4-AA3C-D602EB059B97@gmail.com> <139B721E-A1B4-4256-B202-D4472C0331FB@gmail.com> <87d4aowc1l.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <2E6E5869-2F70-4AF5-A917-7EA863D6BD42@gmail.com> <1ACB40A8-4422-4B9A-A0F7-FE0B9C738299@gmail.com> <87ab5rvds7.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <48600A00-7FAE-4B80-8B3D-6615230918AF@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452803725 18517 80.91.229.3 (14 Jan 2016 20:35:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2530@debbugs.gnu.org, Ian Eure , David Reitter , Chong Yidong , Emacs-Devel devel , Adrian Robert To: Andrew Hyatt Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 14 21:35:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aJobw-0007fr-7G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 21:35:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44483 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJobv-0006QK-GS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:35:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56952) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJobr-0006PT-2B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:35:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJobm-0004lE-Id for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:35:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:32975) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJobm-0004kp-FH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aJobm-0005VO-3K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:35:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan J Third Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 2530 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: unreproducible Original-Received: via spool by 2530-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B2530.145280367321120 (code B ref 2530); Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2530) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2016 20:34:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49428 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aJobJ-0005Ua-3J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:34:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:33917) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aJobG-0005UL-SM for 2530@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:34:31 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id u188so364172792wmu.1 for <2530@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:34:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=pvbKAc6Y/047hwD/mFHKdxtv7Adb3hsFRSnj7NSZum8=; b=NLR62XKKWtEi8bBEW0i3eL9C+jtSnmIahLYDsxgn/ans8qUci8X20MrNT8CvRZWFkz FuLrDH+unWg7ovzLqYOWa0XqNLVsB7hunad2XgInQMZ2WAbNHhd0lAvK6FQJgx5gtPRf 0kCUi9rb1SMZLAMN7DpJV+JCjjlObCGmnb/9pQj21RyJyVFepgEuGCMd1W/5VFBxhoUW X19Tlju32nkPyovmNgEoAqxV6zPUlqlr1iYo0bTvaD06xY3cS3UXzdfvdCX7Gmqx/7qI /tNgvp6dEpPfddxQWlj57YMt/5SiAjZ04d8+dTY0T7rVkOQKIX3QbjXDPM+gd5Gum4SV Jvlw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=pvbKAc6Y/047hwD/mFHKdxtv7Adb3hsFRSnj7NSZum8=; b=enno6KNNQCUXWl3jbLhzAzuVzV9NzVxia6WKDVKN+0nNnjl/+Sba8pkrqK9JA78w0t 9ShM/K4AmaW5ywBOOIohMRcJHAUw3WSYYtKhWkvCn+E/bOnD/1cBUAGxGGORUNDEvR1i 1MILGM+Gz16qDg9ihtlDV/FStIUxj4WjcsoDv9U6Fbk/Vo2hD5lNkfvYYydwXHfJUYOV jSOsR3aYApybYPWEjlTi+g5BZwFqdJurt10yE9bK5gb54vPEYqYILqwsG++9bL1iDAtA RJ8jCwPNCvfneUX0ikXXZ2IVlm/tZ52K+NDY5XeXOAAtp0c+mM7uEhGCqCqjke9FS+VD 4+FQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmTnOYF/j9cVHkOjBcwDqsCaJvE5XnHuFPAUtekB9YaUrsfOXvW9X2nllsXxmgpAphNuWW9bg+cYI3NE1pqDuQxDTk/fQ== X-Received: by 10.194.119.68 with SMTP id ks4mr5897526wjb.45.1452803665320; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:34:25 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from galloway.idiocy.org (c.6.b.f.c.c.b.1.0.4.a.0.d.a.5.e.9.2.1.8.8.f.3.0.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa. [2001:8b0:3f8:8129:e5ad:a40:1bcc:fb6c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q129sm8815569wmd.14.2016.01.14.12.34.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:34:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Andrew Hyatt's message of "Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:08:27 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:111621 gmane.emacs.devel:198158 Archived-At: Andrew Hyatt writes: > There's a bunch of discussion before, in 2009, but as of now, for Emacs > 25, I don't notice any particular slowness on El Capitan. Can anyone > still reproduce a problem here? > > David Reitter writes: > >> On May 5, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Chong Yidong wrote: >> >>> Could either your or David check in the nsterm.m fix, assuming no other >>> problems turn up with it? >> >> I will test it for a day or two, but check it in soon. >> >> I still think there are other places where the same technique would be >> beneficial, but they would be outside of ns*.m, albeit in #ifdefs. From the >> sound of your messages, I take it we'll hold off on that. >> >> Getting back to Ian's original point: Overall, if we were to release now, I >> would consider the NS port "usable", but "experimental" rather than "stable". David Reitter has a number of open bug reports about redraw slowness on OS X and I can't replicate any of the ones I've looked at. I don't know if the display code's been rewritten or something? -- Alan Third