From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 09:13:59 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20160916203414.25203.87032@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87vaxsjmvu.fsf@russet.org.uk> <878tunj2wr.fsf@russet.org.uk> <874m582ixv.fsf@russet.org.uk> <871t0apsxm.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87shsm7hi6.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83a8eucwi2.fsf@gnu.org> <878tudgwlq.fsf@russet.org.uk> <8360pgoyo4.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1jn3ws9.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83a8eqoi08.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1jlacsh.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87y4257gsu.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475511402 10595 195.159.176.226 (3 Oct 2016 16:16:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 16:16:42 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1 (darwin) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 03 18:16:36 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1br5uY-0007zb-VZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 18:16:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38047 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1br5uV-0005Ue-V6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 12:16:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37729) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1br5uB-0005PD-Es for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 12:15:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1br5u6-0005jt-D8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 12:15:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x241.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::241]:36440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1br5tz-0005gf-IS; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 12:15:39 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-x241.google.com with SMTP id cd13so6848276pac.3; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 09:15:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=bBUYfCSuRHFr7YLCA4lbO504/Bkc6CZdh11IbtnCsGE=; b=kyYexociMI9PZ70+AA8GIttjqxhLxITLqnw++DXwfop++jc04UxGKMAVYuKRzYt0L6 1Yr7brVjmcd2Mr2O/froPqp7Ar2wNYPSwzxMi4il13qg71VAJVSguO1NNFtBDElLumDo foCJiUGVcz+woqbMFk+lWW5FD4v+W2++fmv0YD7PwRrgJtY3yui7CNpSn4FAPnqMVbq/ 8asD9PACdoXHOaKS1OLnSSjPIF9/RHKqcWLojj7ALWn/Wjb/Ra5W+kfdOst23cANsXk7 aEE+nx8uOsFFxYR6FHkHVkhbZ+AUwAenCW5jQYrfU6Rward+uAn81P1GYA2OJMkRCmSf b8rQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=bBUYfCSuRHFr7YLCA4lbO504/Bkc6CZdh11IbtnCsGE=; b=gaTdh+tJvGr+3EnxSqyIX7Sb8vBHyjltgP7vi5q5g6yYe86OefnVIfN5T2b6qLsbi/ b438aBLVuYl7su/rCq+YiiZwWInv9gPAEu03ZzozOJMhMp25ePtdSRkT7rxIbB3xrxUN oCxUmMIJNY6P6eXNQK+2CK7x0CkZr4yLsP+yIyQTWfHmb+o/4KoKNUqs/NNDvvBZ04mP PHqEM6h8FMXdZzEsRUwe0iC5I71pOCpPYR4025heoLV7qvKr8RrQ6j+wn/nSvUkZg5u7 vqXdKZS4ngsCOREBTYY4FxQLLnRvhGAw0HaF3iFbfejj35tdaMoaHyzWzDrNKohBc+Bi X/bA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rl80MAWLm3ZZQr32dO7PASDyHehE3cg6TFJaIpcd6OPJj+niZ7DB4yrAVu3qFVc1g== X-Received: by 10.66.185.5 with SMTP id ey5mr39192343pac.175.1475511338412; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 09:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-69-149.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.69.149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x9sm48427775pff.19.2016.10.03.09.15.37 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Oct 2016 09:15:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 982432995DAC; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:15:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y4257gsu.fsf@russet.org.uk> (Phillip Lord's message of "Mon, 03 Oct 2016 13:33:53 +0100") Mail-Followup-To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord), Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::241 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207964 Archived-At: >>>>> "PL" == Phillip Lord writes: PL> Yes, sure. But as Emacs is already capable of building and loading PL> packages in package.el format, why not use that? Because it comes with conventions and restrictions on placement that we may not want to adopt now. I think the package.el discussion should be secondary to how we include ELPA within Emacs core and the tarball. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2