From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Status of MAC/W32/X consolidation and some questions. Date: 11 Mar 2003 00:03:37 +0000 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <5xadg38lnj.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1047341119 14848 80.91.224.249 (11 Mar 2003 00:05:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 00:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 11 01:05:18 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18sXGg-0003rM-00 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 01:05:18 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18sXdA-0000Wx-00 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 01:28:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18sXGP-0006RZ-09 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 19:05:01 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18sXFw-0005zm-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 19:04:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18sXFZ-0005Ss-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 19:04:10 -0500 Original-Received: from server0011.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.56.14] helo=server0027.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18sXFM-0005CM-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 19:03:56 -0500 Original-Received: from nyaumo.jasonr.f2s.com ([195.137.103.251]) h2B03uRT021049; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 00:03:56 GMT Original-Received: from nyaumo.jasonr.f2s.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nyaumo.jasonr.f2s.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F154A92C; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 00:03:38 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: <5xadg38lnj.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> Original-Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:12253 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:12253 storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > On W32, FRAME_W32_P seems to be true even when HAVE_NTGUI is not > defined It is only true when the frame's output is to a W32 GUI frame, according to the definition in frame.h. > (at lease Fframe_parameter in frame.c seems to assume this), This seems to be a bug. But running emacs under the console in w32 does work, so it cannot be a serious as it looks. > * Does it make sense to build NTemacs without HAVE_NTGUI defined? > Is it possible to do that? Yes, it is possible, but probably not common. > * Does the W32 version support -nw? Yes. > If so, is FRAME_W32_P still true when specified? No.