From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 23.0.50; log-view-current-file error Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 14:09:44 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200709042352.l84NquKN011978@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200709060529.l865TlwZ001094@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200709061426.l86EQArj013859@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189257096 22350 80.91.229.12 (8 Sep 2007 13:11:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 13:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 08 15:11:37 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IU063-0006ti-K5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 15:11:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IU061-0004um-0J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 09:11:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IU05A-0003yU-Qo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 09:10:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IU059-0003vv-6P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 09:10:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IU059-0003vO-0B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 09:10:39 -0400 Original-Received: from ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.135]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IU058-0000RL-85 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 09:10:38 -0400 X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Original-Received: from sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.223.202]:57961 helo=localhost.localdomain) by ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.155]:587) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:sl392) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1IU052-0003QL-IY (Exim 4.67) (return-path ); Sat, 08 Sep 2007 14:10:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200709061426.l86EQArj013859@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Thu, 06 Sep 2007 07:26:10 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 Emacs/23.0.50 (20070901) Fedora 7 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78263 Archived-At: On 2007-09-06 15:26 +0100, Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > > > It would be interesting to find out more about that... > > > > You can find out more at the following email list > > dvc-dev@gna.org > > > > or > > > > gmane.emacs.dvc.devel > > Given that you made statements about the DVC design superiority, why > don't you present that here instead of having everyone looking for > clues on a mailing list? This should help in the future if DVC is > proposed for inclusion in emacs. I haven't used dvc yet. I want to use it when it gets into emacs. However I do believe it is superior. -- Leo (GPG Key: 9283AA3F) "(require 'cl) considered harmful" considered harmful http://dto.freeshell.org/blog/blog-2007-09-07-2323.html